Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Thinking about playing EQIIFollow

#1 May 27 2006 at 11:10 PM Rating: Decent
I was an avid Everquest player for around 3 years, and I've been thinking about coming to EQII. I just have a few questions though, the most pressing being is that I've heard unless you have a lot of time to devote to the game, you will fall far behind most of the playerbase.

Now I understand the difference between raiding gear, but in the PoP era of EQ, a player could get a good set of ornate and be fairly well geared, but from my understanding, unless you have a lot of time to put into the game, it's not worth playing because you will be so far behind. Is this true?

The other issue is that I'm about to upgrade my computer a bit, and when I did some diagnostic on my computer which tells me what I need to play the game, I passed everything except the video card (I have that covered, I've got a GeForce 5000 family card now, upgrading to a 6000) and RAM. I know that I have flat out 512 ram, but it's gone to 440 some, and I was wondering if I'd actually be able to play the game with it like this.

Thanks for any advice/help.

Gelton Treewind-The Rathe-

#2 May 28 2006 at 2:41 AM Rating: Good
***
1,885 posts
To get the best gear available, you would need to be in a raiding guild that does regular raids.

However, you don't need the best gear to have a powerful character and be very effective while soloing or grouping. In EQ2 you will find a ton of solo and group content so there is always something to do.

With that much RAM you could play the game, but the lag, choppiness, and low framerate would not make it a good experience. I have just over 700MB myself and have to play on the lowest setting to get the best frame rate - which is still not that great.

So do yourself a favor and get as much RAM as you can afford. It will have a significant impact on your gameplay.
#3 May 28 2006 at 9:42 AM Rating: Decent
Thanks, I appreciate the input.
#4 May 29 2006 at 12:07 AM Rating: Decent
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I too am thinking about returning, but playing EQII instead of EQ.

There are some considerations I have:

Logging onto EQ with anything less than an hour was pretty much a chat session. Is it the same way in EQII?

Are the textures, zone architecture, and graphics in general really as good as Sony boasts?

After playing an Enchanter to the high 50s in EQ, what might I expect playing a chanter in EQII?

I had a great time building a Druid after my Chanter hit 50. Once the druid hit mid 40s, they were fun to run together. Anyone have recommendations for a fun duo that is complementary and has good survivability?

As far as hardware goes, the systems I have now wont play EQII well. Should I pretty much look forward to getting a 2.5Gig (or better) processor, a 256Mb Vid card, and at least a Gig of RAM to get good play results?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#5 May 29 2006 at 1:21 AM Rating: Good
***
1,885 posts
Quote:
Logging onto EQ with anything less than an hour was pretty much a chat session. Is it the same way in EQII?
As soon as you log you can start up doing what you like. Adventuring, questing, crafting, it's all possible. There is a ton of solo content so you will always find something to hunt.

Quote:
Are the textures, zone architecture, and graphics in general really as good as Sony boasts?
Some actually complain that it is TOO realistic. Depending on how powerful your computer is, you can crank up the graphics until your motherboard starts to smoke. Best to have at least 2BG RAM and a 256MB video card to tackle those feats.

Quote:
After playing an Enchanter to the high 50s in EQ, what might I expect playing a chanter in EQII?
A less powerful version. In EQ2 you will not be able to quad-kite, but you can charm, mez, stun, and stifle. Only problem is, there are many other classes that have the same abilities to an extent. So your uniqueness will be diluted.

Quote:
...recommendations for a fun duo that is complementary and has good survivability?
Any class paired with a healer will have a great chance of survival. To make kills quickly, you'll want to also have a DPS class like Scout or Mage. Scouts have better survivability with their better armor, but can't take a beating in melee like a fighter.

If you go with fighter, you may find your fights dragging out due to low DPS. However, Monks and Bruisers have good DPS for a fighter class. It all depends on what you want to have fun with.

And lastly...

...those upgraded specs will do you fine. If you can afford 2GB RAM, go for it.
#6 May 29 2006 at 9:38 AM Rating: Decent
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thank you much, Tutanbriarpaw.

Very good information. I look forward to playing when i get things things in order and the computers upgraded. I also enjoyed your page on guildportal.com.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#7 May 29 2006 at 12:16 PM Rating: Good
****
7,466 posts
The system I have atm is pretty close to the upgraded stat you listed:

2gigs PC3200 Ram (never played with 1 since I upgraded to 2 before I even thought of playing eq2)

AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (2ghz base speed w/o OC'ing)

Radeon 9800 Pro vid card with 128 Ram.

I don't have everything turned up to max, but I play on a self tweaked settings that I believe are based off the next step above balanced. Everything looks sharp a crystal clear, with good textures, flora, reflections, animation, ect and I rarely lag. Unless there about 20 other things/people/spells around me.

I've tweaked some more settings since I took this pic, but the changes have been small things like upping animation and reflections/particle effects, which obviously isn't going to really show well in a pic. (Note I took this pic awhile back to show off the combat log damage to some random people on irc, and didn't feel like them knowing the name of my char, or who got owned, hence the black bars)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v332/Tomec/EQ2_000003.jpg

Obviously you can't see some of the finer points of the settings I use like reflections and such, but that should give you a pretty good idea of the game can look... and that isn't even max settings. It takes a monster of a system to even THINK about running on max.
#8 May 30 2006 at 12:15 PM Rating: Decent
**
801 posts
Most of this is in the FAQ. I made some additions and revisions.
#9 May 30 2006 at 5:40 PM Rating: Decent
I've decided upon my upgrades, which stand as such.
nVidia GeForce 6600/256 MB/AGP
Corsair 512 MB RAMx2
Okia 450 Watt Power Supply
Thanks for all the help you all have given me, and if anyone notices anything wrong with this setup, feel free to say so.
#10 May 30 2006 at 5:51 PM Rating: Good
I'm no expert in Nvidea but I think I remember hearing that the 6600 cards are weak. You might want to try and find a 6800...
#11 Jun 03 2006 at 5:02 AM Rating: Decent
I'm a new player to Everquest II myself. I'd played the Isle demo and it ran rather well on my system. (GeForce 5200/128MB, 512 memory, 2GHZ.) I go and pick the game up and I can't stop lagging. Even on the lowest settings I can't move around with out freezing up. I broke down and ordered a 1gig stick of DDR. I'm crossing my fingers that'll take care of the problem..
#12 Jun 03 2006 at 8:28 AM Rating: Good
****
7,466 posts
FlikNightshade wrote:
I'm a new player to Everquest II myself. I'd played the Isle demo and it ran rather well on my system. (GeForce 5200/128MB, 512 memory, 2GHZ.) I go and pick the game up and I can't stop lagging. Even on the lowest settings I can't move around with out freezing up. I broke down and ordered a 1gig stick of DDR. I'm crossing my fingers that'll take care of the problem..


It should help things for sure, but the video card you have is (literally) one of the WORST out there. Upgrading that to even something cheap like a older Radeon 9x00 would probably boost your preformance a bit also.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 41 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (41)