Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Grr Paladin is a tank!Follow

#1 Apr 30 2006 at 9:45 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
****
4,445 posts
I really get so sick of the attitude of higher level people sometimes. Anyways I started a group last night. I am a 57 paladin. I invited a 59 wizard, 54 templar, 52 necro, 55 conjuror, and a 55 warlock. We all decided to go to POF fight through cyclops and do the Tables instance. For anybody who doesn't know Tables is a instance with lvl 59 to 61 lvl mobs and lvl 62 named. Also the normal mobs are grouped as pairs of ^^^, so they are really abit more powerful then your average heroic encounter.

After we get a full group the 52 necro sends me a tell saying you should have invited a tank. I told him I am a tank. He then responds with something like "Well yea but a guardian would be better."

For starters I was the only tank even LFG, and where do people get off with these attitudes? If a paladin is not a tank what is it?? Im sure not a DPS and im sure not a healer? I guess people think a paladin should just be a space filler if there is nobody else lfg? I get so sick of people thinking the only class that can tank is a Guardian. Also when is the last time a Guardian saved anybody with a 2000hp emergency heal, 950 hp ward, or 650 AE heal? When is the last time a Guardian was able to give a group member a 100% rez? Every class has its ups and downs.

Anyways group went through cyclops and we did Table just fine. The only death we had was when we had 4 lvl 61 ^^^ spiders and I doubt a guardian could have done much better. Had no problem tanking lvl 62 named in tables and we did it with 1 healer (yes thats right you don't need to have 2 healers in a group people!).

Thats another thing that ticks me off is people who refuse to group unless they are in a group with 2 healers. You don't need 2 healers in a group if your tank has any clue how to play his/her class. Its hard enough sometimes to find 1 healer, let alone 2.

Anyways wanted to rant abit. This game would be alot more enjoyable if people would quit being so blasted picky. I mean worst case what is going to happen if you get a bad group? Going to die a few times gain debt that will be gone by morning, and spend a few gold on repairs....big deal. Its better then sitting aroudn gaining .10% exp killing solo mobs.
____________________________
Hi
#2 Apr 30 2006 at 1:33 PM Rating: Good
***
1,885 posts
/adds-a-cube-of-sugar-to-fronglos-coffe-and-nods

I feel of the many classes, there are also some "pure" classes. Those that fill more of a single role, do it very well, but don't do much else.

A Guardian does have the best defense and agro holding ability, but that's about it. Wizards have the best nnukes, but that's about it.

You are in the same realm as I. We both are very useful, and have more versatility than those pure classes, although they do a few special things better than we can.

As I've also posted in other threads, the ability also depends on many other factors; gear and spell upgrades, player skill, group skill, etc.

Some people are button-holed into getting the mythilogical "perfect-group", and that's when they'll say something dumb.

"A Guardian would be better." Yea, and a Ferrari will go faster, but your only going to the corner store.
#3 Apr 30 2006 at 3:21 PM Rating: Decent
**
546 posts
That is what is great about this game... The variety of classes that fill different roles.

When I make a group, I usually look for a Guardian, Paladin, or Berzerker as a MT. I will however take a monk, or bruiser as a MT if none other is lfg.

Now just say all classes are lfg, I would take a Paladin or Guardian for a MT, without favor to either, as long as I get one of them.

I dont see why people would hate on them. In Everquest 2, with the many classes there is, and several different grades of mobs to fight, you can customize a group however, and still go out and get some xp. I love this game!

Edited, Sun Apr 30 16:31:20 2006 by Pjstock
#4 Apr 30 2006 at 4:38 PM Rating: Decent
**
636 posts
I have to say that a paladin is better then a guard due to their heals. I also know that gaurdians are hecka dull so but do have great tanking skills (though my Guardian got boring at lvl 25). It is annoying to be treated like you arent a good tank....but prove em wrong by getting a gaurd in your group and see who tanks better.
#5 Apr 30 2006 at 9:27 PM Rating: Good
A while back I was MH in a Rivervale group with 2 tanks, a guardian and a pally. They alternated pulls with the "idle" tank running out to get a fresh mob as soon as the current mob's health was down around 20-30%. This gave us us an unending stream of mobs that would only stop when someone called LOM.

And to tell you the truth, I couldn't see any difference between them! Both of these guys really knew their stuff and the group rocked! In fact, the pally would often toss a heal that would land a tic before mine so I was never the least bit worried that I might lose anyone... it was like having another healer watching my back!

Bottom line is IMHO, Pallys make great tanks! You were just stuck with a group of narrow minded fools! I agree with the poster above who said it was an opportunity to show them how good pallys really are!
#6 Apr 30 2006 at 11:50 PM Rating: Default
Sounds like you just had an ******* in your group fronglo.

Seems like no matter where you go,online or in RL you run into one.

Hang in there.
#7 May 01 2006 at 3:33 AM Rating: Decent
**
636 posts
Hehe...lets just say pallies can live longer than guardians in some cases due to the group heals they get. Paladins can really save lives with their heals and rezzes.
#8 May 01 2006 at 9:19 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
That is what is great about this game... The variety of classes that fill different roles.

When I make a group, I usually look for a Guardian, Paladin, or Berzerker as a MT. I will however take a monk, or bruiser as a MT if none other is lfg.

Now just say all classes are lfg, I would take a Paladin or Guardian for a MT, without favor to either, as long as I get one of them.

I dont see why people would hate on them. In Everquest 2, with the many classes there is, and several different grades of mobs to fight, you can customize a group however, and still go out and get some xp. I love this game!

What are you whining for Fronglo? As you notice SK never even made it into the list of tanks, hehehehe. My Sk is used for solo play only and I don't think anyone thinks about them being tanks.
At least pallys are still by most peeps anyway.
#9 May 01 2006 at 10:54 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
****
4,445 posts
Yea I think both PAladin and Shadowknights don't get noticed for osme of their special abilities. I can't count how many times I have thrown group AE heals, lay of hands, etc to save somebody and then you see "Great healing (insert healers name)!"

I figure Shadowknights are in the same boat Paladins are on it though, not to leave them out :p
____________________________
Hi
#10 May 04 2006 at 12:08 PM Rating: Decent
**
546 posts
Quote:
As you notice SK never even made it into the list of tanks


I'm Sorry for not putting SK's, I forgot about them. I do consider them just fine tanks, and on the same level as the ones I listed. I simply forgot, im sorry!
#11 May 12 2006 at 10:09 PM Rating: Decent
As a healer on both EQ and EQ2, and a tank on EQOA, I must say that it isn't the class i.e. pally, sk. guardian, or whatever, that makes the group go well or bad. It is the WAY that toon is PLAYED. Sure, a guardian may have more ac or hp or whatever, but if I'm on a healer and I'm grouped with a pally, I pretty well know not much can go wrong if he knows his job. On the other hand, if a guardian runs in intending to grab one mob or encounter and ends up with 6 major heroic encounters on his tail, I vote nay on the guard. And to tell the truth, I know of a certain swashy who can out-tank a guard any day because of her skill.
#12 May 13 2006 at 6:33 AM Rating: Good
**
949 posts
i love a paladin tank.. amends is awesome. You can hold soo much agro if you have that on an assassin/ranger/wizard... its great. If i had a choice between zerk/pal/SK...i pick a paladin.. guardian and pal are like a 50 50 split..depends on the guy i would pick.
#13 May 15 2006 at 10:27 AM Rating: Good
As a Templar I actually like having a pally in the group or tanking. They tend to save my life on occasion when I am mezzing the adds and they attack me. The guardian may be able to taunt it off of me but the pally can heal me so I dont have to waste my power or time healing myself.
#14 Jun 04 2006 at 3:50 PM Rating: Decent
i agree with pretty much everyone else, pallys are awesome tanks, if a pally and a gaurd are both lfg i actually usually go for the pally first, but also bruisers are fairl good tanks :-) i have a lvl 20 bruiser, does great damage and whenever im in a group i have no trouble holding aggro
#15REDACTED, Posted: Jun 12 2006 at 4:45 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) gurdians suck man once there prots are up the useless they cant even help parties out when in trouble. Also pallys being able to raise helps a hella of alot. i mean ive dished out more dmg and taken more dmg then a guardin has, but note i have best armor for level and spells masters but its all how good the party is. for one thing i played in a party and the monk and or bruizer tanked better then me because of all of the agility so he was never hit. paladins are just great over all if you are skilled enough to handle it
#16 Jun 12 2006 at 7:30 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,246 posts
Quote:
gurdians suck man once there prots are up the useless they cant even help parties out when in trouble. Also pallys being able to raise helps a hella of alot. i mean ive dished out more dmg and taken more dmg then a guardin has, but note i have best armor for level and spells masters but its all how good the party is. for one thing i played in a party and the monk and or bruizer tanked better then me because of all of the agility so he was never hit. paladins are just great over all if you are skilled enough to handle it


Thank you for those erudite words of wisdom Smiley: rolleyes

If you really think Guardians *can't even help parties out when in trouble* maybe you should read through our list of utility spells sometime. We have more group protection abilities than any other tank.

This post is not intended to start a Guardian vs Paladin discussion. Pallies make excellent tanks Smiley: smile

Edited, Jun 12th 2006 at 7:32am EST by Bluie
#17 Jun 12 2006 at 12:21 PM Rating: Decent
I think this is the same idiot that was shooting his mouth off in the fighter forumns a while ago, thought I had thourghly put him in his place about the Guardian Vs. Pally stuff, but I guess he diddn't listen.
#18 Jun 12 2006 at 3:43 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
****
4,445 posts
Are you talking about me being a idiot, or the person saying Guardians sucks? I have no problem saying Guardians have better mitigation, hitpoints, and better taunts. But that doesn't mean they are the only only choice for a tank. As I said each class has its pros and cons. Not often that you see a Guardian doing AE heals to help out with a lacking healer, or doing a Lay of Hand type spell. Also Ever since I got adept 3 taunts and that DOF group agression transfer spell I have very seldomly lost agression. Few times that I have is usually a Wizard chain casting Ice Comet over and over, and there isn't enough taunts in the world for that.
____________________________
Hi
#19REDACTED, Posted: Jun 12 2006 at 5:02 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) they dont have better any of that ive played with guardians all the way to level 65 and most i played with they suck my hitpoint are more and everything i mean even my mit. if someone can show me a good guardian tank ill beleive it but ive seen very few and most groups ive been in there is either a paladin or a monk or briuser tanking and also they dont even want a guardian. Only thing with guardian is when they get there heavy hittin spell in the 60s for hate but other then that they worthless to me and many others in game
#20 Jun 12 2006 at 5:55 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,246 posts
Quote:
Are you talking about me being a idiot, or the person saying Guardians sucks?


He's not talking about you Fronglo Smiley: smile
#21 Jun 12 2006 at 7:48 PM Rating: Decent
**
546 posts
Quote:
if someone can show me a good guardian tank ill beleive


Ironchin level 49 Guardian Najena server!

5,324 HP self buffed, and not sure on exact mitigation, but its very good also!

Now, Guardian's are the most pure tank class in Everquest II, end of story. In Terms of there combat arts and attributes. They are not the "Best", nor is a paladin, Shadowknight or berzerker.

All the plate classes are equal, depending upon the player playing them, and the equipment there equiped with. When I had first made my Guardian, I was under the impression they were the best, especially end game.

As I reached the higher levels on my necro, I saw there was really no difference in the plate tanks, if the person playing them was good, and equiped well.

I have grown bored of my guardian to be honest. I enjoy tanking, however I find guardians a bit plain. I would have enjoyed a SK alot more I think... If only I could convert my Guardian into a SK the same level, with the same gear?!
#22REDACTED, Posted: Jun 12 2006 at 10:14 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) yes ive played guardian to 50 and i cant stand it i dont feel i tank any better and i am bored of it. my main love is paladin i love the heals and magic it can do and can ward against mobs like i said i have master spells and armor and ive met guardians i that are like 2-3 levels ahead of me and i have more mit then them and hp. also blue you should try SK ive been playing it and i am starting to love it they are some bad *** tanks if you use them right
#23 Jun 13 2006 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
like i said i have master spells and armor


Quote:
ive met guardians i that are like 2-3 levels ahead of me and i have more mit then them and hp.



Don't confuse a class thing with an armor thing. Of course your gonna have more mitigation and HP if you have tricked out armor, but it doesn't matter that you're a friggan pally! With a guardians combat arts and buffs, master skilled with the armor you are talking about, I'd be willing to bet their miti and HP is higher then yours.


I'm not bashing pally's at all, I played one to about 40 and loved it, all I'm saying is Guardians ain't the gimped tank numbnuts here is trying to say they are.

Quote:
Are you talking about me being a idiot, or the person saying Guardians sucks?



Undisputer of course, couldn't call you an idiot, you're a regular that always knows what he's talking about lol. I only do that to the ignorant WoW scum that like to plague our forumn every now and again. BTW if any of you have ever noticed, I hate ignorance more then anything else, thats why I go off sometimes lol.
#24 Jun 13 2006 at 12:54 PM Rating: Good
**
315 posts

Dak said:

Quote:
I hate ignorance more then anything else, thats why I go off sometimes


/Rhaiyne puts on her ignorance cap and says...

" I don't mean to be ignorant here but, What's a MT? What's a Guardian? What's a "Pally"? I say Pally's are the best since they have a cuter name..." Smiley: grin

/Rhaiyne removes ignorance cap and stops giving Dak a hard time.
#25REDACTED, Posted: Jun 13 2006 at 5:28 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) First off ive never played WoW and don't even own the game. All iv'e played was FFXI and EQ2 and ive made it to 70 with sage and paladin. Want to meet me in game come meet me my name is Rolan on everfrost server. Keep your mouth shut unless you know the person and quit judging them. Just awnser the damn question from the main post and not comment on other opinions.
#26 Jun 13 2006 at 5:37 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,246 posts
Quote:
Just awnser the damn question from the main post and not comment on other opinions.


Sorry mate, that's not the way forums work. You put your opinion out there for public viewing, it's going to get commented on. Specially when it's a load of old twaddle. Smiley: oyvey
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 47 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (47)