Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Window Vista + EQ2Follow

#1 Aug 03 2005 at 1:51 PM Rating: Good
**
949 posts
Anyone load it yet and knows if it works or not? heh

Just loaded it on my laptop (got a spare drive) and so far it looks sweeeeet

2.2 gig install on it. Bloated but tons of good tools on it.

Will let you know if i have any troubles ;p
#2 Aug 03 2005 at 2:33 PM Rating: Good
Ummm... what is *Window Vista*, exactly?...

/em looks down & scrapes toe of boot in dirt while mumbling something about not being an IT guy...
#3 Aug 03 2005 at 2:42 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,885 posts
Newest Windows Operating System, I think.
#4 Aug 03 2005 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
**
949 posts
that would be correct. Newest windows OS. Looks pretty sweet, will have a few screenshots later.

Install took about 20 minutes. Very simple that i think my mother can do the install without knowing what she is doing. That was the time of booting up with the windows DVD to being at my desktop.

All drivers but the 56k modem on my laptop were installed.

Boot up time was less about 15 secs.

Installed EQ2 and it runs just like my xp was running.

This is a 3.4ghz p4 extreme edition with gig of ram and a 256mb gefoce 6800 gp ultra.

Will full with it for about a week on my laptop and if it works good i will format my real laptop harddrive and put it on. Got a spare drive so my orginal data will not be lost.
#5 Aug 03 2005 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
**
949 posts
hmmm with nothing loaded and idle on the desktop after reboot. Takes up 454 megs of ram. I switch to windows classic view it drops to 364 megs hahah. Yeah. 90 megs just for the extra visuals.

I just thought that was extremely high. More then double what my computer used idle.
#6 Aug 03 2005 at 7:48 PM Rating: Decent
Just read about Vista for the first time today. There will be some issues with certain monitors. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25094

Vista is the new name for what was to be Longhorn, the latest Windows OS.
#7 Aug 03 2005 at 9:05 PM Rating: Good
**
553 posts
AFAIK, there wasn't a difference running EQ2 in Vista or in plain 32-bit XP.

I did notice the additional ram taken up by Vista but it didn't seem to affect EQ2 any.
#8 Aug 03 2005 at 10:58 PM Rating: Good
Before now, I had only heard it refered to by the code name Longhorn. But if they're almost ready to release it, makes sense to give it a real name.

Dang! I was just getting comfortable with XP... now I gotta switch to a 64 bit OS?
#9 Aug 04 2005 at 8:39 AM Rating: Good
**
949 posts
There is a 32bit and 64bit version of the OS. wont touch the 64bit till intel releases more 64bit chips.
Plus i will not be using it till a lot later when they make it so it wont take up as much ram. its just crazy to take up that much.
#10 Aug 04 2005 at 12:14 PM Rating: Decent
http://www.theregister.com/2005/08/04/vista_virus/
#11 Aug 04 2005 at 6:51 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
hmmm with nothing loaded and idle on the desktop after reboot. Takes up 454 megs of ram. I switch to windows classic view it drops to 364 megs hahah. Yeah. 90 megs just for the extra visuals.

I just thought that was extremely high. More then double what my computer used idle.


454 MB RAM?!? that seems a bit crazy to me, if that's true then i won't touch vista with a 10 foot pole.
#12 Aug 04 2005 at 7:45 PM Rating: Good
**
949 posts
yup, that is very true. It is still in beta. And i know business's wont really touch that thing at all. Our standard build at work for computers are 256 megs of ram. 512 for the people that actually need it. I dont see us upgrading 3000+ pcs to 768 megs of ram just to hand standard apps.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 116 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (116)