Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

SOE Forums Locked downFollow

#1 May 06 2005 at 3:56 PM Rating: Default


Everyone that cancled their subscription has been barred from posting in their forums. Apparently they have angered so many people that they have to lock down their forums to prevent them from posting. That's hillarious. It's like watching a train wreck in slo-motion.
#2 May 06 2005 at 4:38 PM Rating: Decent
Or maybe they just feel that if you are not a participating member of an SOE game you have no reason to post to a forum that deals in those games...

What kind of additional trouble did you want to stir up there?

Unite the workers and all that stuff? Guess you'll have to peddle your drivel elsewhere now... Oh, well...
#3 May 06 2005 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,885 posts
Quote:
Posting on the official forums requires a current EverQuest II subscription. You can read the boards without being a subscriber, but you can't make a post.

If you have a subscription and are unable to log in to the forums, make sure you have registered a forum name. When your forum name is set, click the "Sign In" link in the upper left area of the forums under the EverQuest II logo. Enter your Station name and password, then click the "Save Your Password" box. You should now be logged into the forums.

Be sure to abide by our Rules of Conduct when interacting with others in the community, and take a look at our FAQ section in which you can find answers to many common questions.

To find information on a particular subject, use the SEARCH function at the bottom of the page. Other community members will appreciate it if you search for answers before posting questions.

Welcome to the EverQuest II boards!
===========================
Moorgard
EverQuest II Community Guy


Having an Everquest subscription to post would mean you must pay the monthly fee of your Everquest II account to post.

You must pay to post?

At the very top of the link in the station.com line is a button for "join free". I tried to click on that to test and see if it still functions, but I can't get it to work. It's possible my firewalls and POS computer at work aren't allowing it. I'll try again later from home.

I'm thinking of creating a new Yahoo email to create a new station.com account to see if I can post to the EQ2 boards...without paying and without having an Everquest II subscription.

#4 May 06 2005 at 4:54 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Or maybe they just feel that if you are not a participating member of an SOE game you have no reason to post to a forum that deals in those games...

What kind of additional trouble did you want to stir up there?

Unite the workers and all that stuff? Guess you'll have to peddle your drivel elsewhere now... Oh, well...


I can still post. Perhaps you could troll someone else's posts spanky... Because you're "drivel" isn't needed here.
#5 May 06 2005 at 5:02 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,885 posts
Quote:
Everyone that cancled their subscription has been barred from posting in their forums.


I guess I didn't gather that in Moorgards post. Yet I can infer it with my previous post.

Quote:
I can still post.

Charli, I'm a bit confused. Since you can still post to the SOE forum, I guess you have not cancelled your account?
#6 May 06 2005 at 5:31 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,246 posts
My understanding is that you've always needed a current subscription to post there. I see that's a new post from Moorguard though, so I guess they just felt the need to reiterate it.

Maybe some of the angry young men complained because they can't keep arguing after they cancelled.
#7 May 06 2005 at 6:04 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I can still post. Perhaps you could troll someone else's posts spanky... Because you're "drivel" isn't needed here.

Oh, so is anyone who disagrees with you trolling, or did you just pick me?

Edited, Fri May 6 19:05:46 2005 by OldBlueDragon
#8 May 06 2005 at 8:02 PM Rating: Good
The policy makes sense to me. It is a Forum for EQ2 players to use, why allow anyone that doesnt play EQ2 to use it.
#9 May 07 2005 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
*
102 posts
It is an offical message board for a video game. What do you expect.. all kinds of game companies do it. Bioware does it.. I have to use my never winter nights cd key to post on the offical boards.. I have to use my xbox live account to post on the microsoft xbox live forums.

If you are not a paying customer you have no rights to complain. Do it on a free message board.

I run and have run all kinds of gaming sites.. some pay some free.. if it is pay.. and you pay you get your posting rights.. if it is not and you post garbage then well you get to watch from the stands.
#10 May 08 2005 at 4:56 AM Rating: Decent
30 posts
They are getting a lot of negative feedback and this is just a last ditch attempt to control the public perception of it all. The exchange forum is still getting attacked constantly by people that are upset about SoE's moves. Lame and weak. Yet another sign of desperation on the part of the SOE. Pretty sad...
#11 May 09 2005 at 9:55 AM Rating: Default
Clarification about the cancelled accounts...

I cancelled one of my Station Access Passes... I had two & my daughter had one.
My second one was cancelled on the May 5th but since the renewal date was May 1st (all my accounts are on the 1st) I was billed for the month of May. They DO NOT pro-rate their billing and they bill a month in advance.
I have until June 1st until that account dies. I am using that account to make "constructive criticisms" of the SWG: CU. I really don't care about the Exchange Server because they're not going to effect me in the least.

If I still want to buy Plat/Gold/Items/ETC. offline I still can.

All it takes is me paying whoever with my credit card. I then set up an offline seller in my Inn Room. I offer a __insert name__ for __insert amount__ and the whoever shows up and buys it.

This is NO different than the peopl in EQ1 offering a Water Flask for 50Kpp... everyone knew what that was all about and it's NOT a EULA violation. If it was it would be nearly impossible to prove!
Yeah, that guy really wanted that "SPECIAL" water flask... super curative powers and all!

Anyways, I digress.
Yes, my account is cancelled... Yes, I can still post on the page... and YES, I do troll in the SOE: SWG forums...

I seriously doubt you will see any game magazine actually post the truth about what is going on. Perhaps they'll print some of the letters to the editor but who really reads those?
SOE can controll those magazines just by offering to purchase a two-page color spread ad. Or, if they don't like the upcoming edition, they'll just make a discrete call to the marketing department and poof, there goes those negative comments.
When was the last time you've read a gamer mag that really trashed a game from a company that bought alot of ad space?

Only one I can think of was Master of Orion III. That game should have been called Master of Database. Absolute guano!

Ok, Elodarian, focus!!!

SONY is controlling it's boards which is their right. They own the forums, we rent access to their game servers... PEOPLE, read your EULA... You haven't bought the game you think you did. You're only leasing access.
#12 May 09 2005 at 4:50 PM Rating: Decent
I canceled my account. But it's not inactive yet. Therefor I can still post.

I'm NOT posting anymore however. I am going through and deleting all the guides I wrote (Don't want them to be used to earn people money)

They have the right to do what they are doing... but (just like the ES servers) I think its rather shadey.

There are a lot of people that WANT to play EQ2 but feel the ES is so wrong that they can not support it. Their only way of letting SOE know how they feel is via the forum. Someone that sticks around in the forum after their account has been cancled obviously would like to return. By banning them from the forums SOE is basically throwing those customers away.

What if SOE decided the game would be more profitable if they added Pornography to it? Virtual brothels and what not? What if you objected and they said "Tuff, you're banned from the forum for stiring up trouble. Look at this poll! 40% of our customers want **** in game!"
#13 May 09 2005 at 10:42 PM Rating: Decent
The Best Little ***** House on Lucan De'Lere.....

Woot!
#14 May 10 2005 at 6:02 AM Rating: Decent
You have never been able to post on the EQII forums without an active EQII account. This is not something new and is not in response to objections over the Exchange servers. What if Sony did offer **** on seperate servers that could not in any way affect you unless you opted to join those servers? Umm, I think I would still support it then. This isn't going to change things for the people on the normal servers.
#15 May 10 2005 at 6:49 AM Rating: Good
**
553 posts
Well Oisin,

Would you buy stock in a company that made cigarettes? Some people wouldn't.

Anyway, I think this horse has been flogged enough. SOE wants you to have an active account to post on their forums. I don't see anything new in this.

As for the ES, I voted NO.. as in I won't be participating in it but I don't care if people send thousands twinking themselves up... as long as it's on another server. It'll be interesting to see how it really works out and whether or not you and I will be around to see how it turns out...

#16 May 10 2005 at 12:45 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
You have never been able to post on the EQII forums without an active EQII account. This is not something new and is not in response to objections over the Exchange servers.


Yes, it is something new. You are wrong. How do I know? I have 2 Station accounts, 1 that had an EQ subscription... 1 that did not. My 2nd computer always defaulted to the Non-EQ2 account and I was always able to post via that account up until last week.

Quote:
What if Sony did offer **** on seperate servers that could not in any way affect you unless you opted to join those servers? Umm, I think I would still support it then.


You have no idea how to see someone elses point of view? You couldn't imagine how someone might be offended by such a thing? I could understand that YOU might support it.. but I can't understand how you could be so blind as to not be able to see how many people would refuse to give money to a company that would so denegrate women, game play, and potentially expose childeren to that sort of thing. (and this is very much how I see exchange servers)

Quote:
This isn't going to change things for the people on the normal servers.


I think the next few months will be quite the wake-up call for you my friend. If a system can be exploited, it will be exploited. And the SE servers are an obvious, wide gaping exploit. They will make plat and account sales on all servers sky rocket. The top 100 accounts on EQ2players.com will all be purchased accounts. The price of goods, especially low level items will be insain. SOE will start creating content to exploit the exchange servers. People will buy level 50 characters, find out theres no level 50 content and quit. There will be a mass exodus. Within 12 months I expect and email from SOE that reads "Check out EQ2! No more exchange servers! Tuffer content! Free 1 month trial to returning characters!"
#17 May 10 2005 at 1:48 PM Rating: Decent
Gee or maybe a company that is part of SONY, a giant global corporation might engage in something... gee I don't know, market research perhaps? That might tell them what will and will not increase their profit margin?

I'm not saying that ES is a good idea, I would personally not participate, I'm not even saying it might not be a giant flop, but wouldn't you have to assume that a company such as SOE does SOME of its homework? I mean come on, this isn't some fly by night sweatshop of a gaming company.

You have to at least assume they are making an intelligent decision from their viewpoint. Otherwise, by assuming they are all morons, any argument you make is going to look foolish.

Personally I think that the IGE type companies aren't just going to fold up and die, they will either continue their work on the non-exchange servers, or they will find a new way to make money in the ES environment. Supposedly the IGE guy made millions selling plat on various games, again assuming that he or whoever took over is a moron and makes poor decisions is a bad place to start from.

Never assume your "enemy" is an idiot, it puts you at a disadvantage.

Just because you, and many others (including me) don't approve of the ES system, doesn't mean that SOE is foolish to go that route. It just means that some, like you, will quit over it, while others, like me, will wait and see. And still others, professionals with more money than time, will be attracted by a game they can "buy into" without worrying about getting ripped off. It may seem slimy or immoral to you, but it may be a very intelligent business decision for SOE. Its hard to say right now, but I personally assume they have done the research and have figured out how it will impact their bottom line. I assume they are intelligent, corporate business people, not some morons sitting around figuring out how to ***** the player base.
#18 May 10 2005 at 5:02 PM Rating: Decent
See, your argument is based on an aged old, flawed idea that if an idea is more profitable or more popular it is better. I think Hitler proved that idea wrong.

In music we often think of Bands that have "Sold out" in the same way we look at SOE now. A band changes their music to appeal to a larger audience. Then they use their higher record sales and larger fan base to justify their change. "Look, we have more fans than ever now... we obviously made the right choice!" But in order to make this change they need to appeal to less sophisticated people. Yes, I'll say it: A larger Audience = A Dumber Audience. They make it truly impossible to innovate or change the music industry as a whole... because their new fan base will not tolerate anything that might be difficult to listen to.

SOE may have a huge success with ES. They may make a LOT of money. But there with the changes they've made, there comes a price. They may be the biggest MMPOG on the block, but they wont be the best... or the most interesting. For true innovation people will look elsewhere. SOE has decided they would rather serve Big-Macs than Steak. Simple as that.
#19 May 10 2005 at 5:32 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,246 posts
Actually if this works out ok for SoE, it's easy to see the idea spreading to other online games.

Plat/item/account buying is a menace that is not going away.
SoE had 2 choices, continue with the status quo or try something else.

I see Station Exchange as a bold, innovative move. They would've known full-well the extent of the back-lash they'd receive but decided something different just had to be done. So they had to wear the short-term onslaught of criticism and cancelled accounts for the longterm good of their games.

Always despised plat buying myself, but I'll support SoE giving this a try as a means to controlling it. Specially if they accompany the exchange servers with a *brutal* crackdown on regular servers, as they said they will.

The other aspect is their CS which they say is 40% given to issues around plat buying.

So if they can drasically reduce the plat selling on regular servers and improve CS, it's worth a try. And hey, if they pick up some extra income from commissions, that's all good, more money to invest in gaming development.

#20 May 10 2005 at 6:27 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I think Hitler proved that idea wrong.


You have lost at the internet. Thanks for playing.

Remember, once you throw down the Hitler card, you've automatically lost the argument.

As far as your moron comment:

Quote:
See, your argument is based on an aged old, flawed idea that if an idea is more profitable or more popular it is better.


I think I was very clear that I'm against ES. However, you assume that because it seems like a bad idea to you that its wrong, and that its therefore a bad business decision. Do you even begin to understand how little those things have in common?

Just because some number of vocal players say they have quit because of this (and a lot less quit than said they did, I pretty much guarantee that). Just because a lot of vocal players say that they don't like the idea doesn't make it a bad business decision.

How much of the player base is actually against ES? How many will leave over it? How many will SOE gain because they add ES?

Unless you have numbers for these questions, you are guessing like everyone else on whether this is a good business decision.

Business. Guess what/ That's what SOE is doing, running a business.

While the idea of selling and buying virtual goods is repugnant to me, and some others, that doesn't mean its amoral or even immoral. It just means that we find it distasteful.

I've known it was going on for a long time, now SOE wants in on the action. I don't like the idea of making it more prevalent, but it was going on whether they sanctioned it or not. At least this way less people will get ripped off.

Anyway, guess this thread is over.
#21 May 11 2005 at 9:58 AM Rating: Decent
Lol, I'll repeat my point: A larger audience = a dumber audience.

You're proof.
#22 May 11 2005 at 9:13 PM Rating: Decent
Looks to me like it is about an even split for, against and neutral for the Station Exchange.

Here are the results of the polls:

What do you think of Station Exchange?

For It: 33.71%
Neutral: 32.61%
Against It: 33.68%

Do you want to participate in Station Exchange?

Yes: 24.76%
Don't Care: 29.90%
No: 45.34%
Poll results posted here
#23 May 12 2005 at 10:07 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Lol, I'll repeat my point: A larger audience = a dumber audience.

You're proof.


Please come back to the forums when you can have an intelligent discussion (or maybe when you learn to read). For now, its time for this thread to end I think.

#24 May 16 2005 at 1:16 PM Rating: Default
SOE forums have always been under **** control and **** driven dont expect much from them except to take your monthly fee's and get no customer service AT ALL SOE cant even answer simple questions directly asked to them this is a type of product that you just have to play if you want and deal with the problems no real customer service here just take it and like is their motto.

They feel that they have enough customer's addicted that if they lose you over a legit problem they dont have to fix or care cause your one in a million nice SOE keep it up and when a new game comes out hopefully it will be with another company that give's a ****.

I dare anyone to try and prove otherwise

Edited, Mon May 16 14:19:13 2005 by SKdude

Edited, Mon May 16 14:19:31 2005 by SKdude
#25 May 17 2005 at 12:44 PM Rating: Decent
I've played a lot of games... including a lot of MMPOGs... I left EQ1 AND EQ2 for basically the same reason: SOE and their absolutely horrid relationship with their customers. No other game I have played has been written by a company so dedicated to ripping its customers off. I've never caught another software publisher lieing strait to my face. And with SOE is happens over and over and over again. They don't even attempt to hide it. They will lie right to you, and then say "whoops" later on.

I'm not playing any MMPOG right now because of this. (playing guildwars) I'll play vanguard when it comes out... but I will never again give any branch of the Sony corporation my money. I will not support their buisness practices. I could not think of a company more morally bankrupt than SOE... and I hold Sony to account for allowing SOE to behave like they do.
#26 May 17 2005 at 1:40 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I could not think of a company more morally bankrupt than SOE


Damn I sure hope you aren't running any Microsoft products on your computer then!
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 82 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (82)