Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

EQ2 or WoW>> Which is better??Follow

#427 May 03 2005 at 2:48 PM Rating: Decent
I think the honor syst has regulated the amount of lvl 60's goin around just feasting on lvl 25 noobs in contested zones. What can you really do though, I think it has opened a new aspect of the game and gave the higher level chars something else to focus on rather than just farming all the lower lvl mobs that maybe a 45-50 lvl need for exp or quests. This will also help drops go into more useful hands rather than a 60 who farmed it for money. I think this game is sweet and will only get better w/ time. Im all for the honor system and will never play a non-PVP server. IIts never boring thats for sure
#428 May 03 2005 at 5:19 PM Rating: Decent
**
976 posts
PvP Honor system = good.

PvP Honor system on RP server = not so good.

For example there are these threads on my server (there were more but Blizz only allows so many pages/days in the forum history and they were wiped last Tues.)


http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-realm-cenarioncircle&t=51884&p=1&tmp=1#post51884

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-realm-cenarioncircle&t=57327&p=1&tmp=1#post57327

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-realm-cenarioncircle&t=57818&p=1&tmp=1#post57818

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?FN=wow-realm-cenarioncircle&T=58199&P=2


CC was never a carebear server, BUT we always wanted (by WE I mean the more active members of our server) to keep even battles somewhat RPish.



Eh, that don't happen no more, thanks to "Honor" system. People can't quest in Tarren Mill, people get corpse camped for honor without any STORY or RP involved with it, people are all trying to get "phat lewt" and the "d00dz" have come out of nowhere to make the RP server into chaos.

Honor System should have been restricted to Battlegrounds OR there should also be a DISHONOR system. AKA you kill the same NPC within an hour you get dishonor points. Kill a quest giver more than once you get dishonor points. Not letting your opponent fully heal before re-engaging them you get dishonor points.

That'd put those "leet d00dz" back on PvP servers where they belong. There are too few RP servers as it is, we really didn't want this Honor System to ruin it, and though it hasn't completely RUINED it, it made a big dent and many people do not like it.

Edited, Tue May 3 18:32:47 2005 by Ivven
#429 May 04 2005 at 12:13 AM Rating: Decent
*
57 posts
Canela wrote

Quote:

I enjoy being able to log on for an hour and getting almost half a level of Exp at even at lvl 30 solo-ing. I currently have a lvl 50 War in Wow and have done so in just under 2 months.


That sounds so much like playing Diablo. IMHO, a level 60 in WoW is nothing since leveling up is so fast. You are just a nobody among the many thousands of 60, nothing specials. In EQ1, when you get a character to level 70, you will feel that you have beaten the odd to get there. Other people will remember you. As a casual player, it takes me close to 2 years to get to 65 with 300AA. Taking a character that get kills by rats to one that can slay dragons and gods gives you warm feeling when you finally get there. I don't think you'll ever feel that way in WoW. Baldur's Gate series took me 1-2 months to finish. If an MMORPG, only need 2 months to get to the end, what's the point of playing it. PvP can be fun at first, but after a few months it becomes boring; almost feel like xp grinding. Reminds me of Warcraft 3 DOTA map, just on bigger map.

For EQ2, the xp gain is between EQ1 and WoW. When you see a level 50 adventurer with level 50 in tradeskills, you know that it takes a significant amount of time to get there. This is what I believe will make a game more fun in the long run as it allows you to slowly build up your character. My character has done close to 200 quests and he is still only level 23. Glad that rushing to 50 is not the only options to enjoy EQ2. With WoW, I don't think you have any options but to level up to 60. No separate level for guild, no traderskill level, no room/house for you to decorate up and too little things to do for group.
#430 May 04 2005 at 9:48 AM Rating: Decent
**
258 posts
Eq2 as a much better lifespan, i am not saying wow is a bad game, but i know many people who went on EQ2 looks for the same kind of continuity that they had on eq1, they want to be able to play their game for 5+ years.

Now i know if i go and buy wow, ill level to 60 and play alot in the first month but once you reach the top... its over. Sure you enjoy it a week or 2 but then what. If they raise the level cap youll just reach it in another 5 minute gameplay so whats the point.

Its 2 different kind of game, the only problem i see with wow is the fast decrease in population that will happen, they will have to scratch a whole lot of server eventually ( i guess i dont know how many server they have ) Because their just isnt anything to keep the player playing for more than a year.
#431 May 04 2005 at 11:33 PM Rating: Decent
I think if nothing else, the players will make EQ2 a great game. Without a doubt, the player base is a different species altogether when compared to WoW. The majority of them coming from EQ (1), or coming from WoW after feeling that there is something missing compared to the original EQ. (as is the situation with myself) With a good part of the WoW crowd being bnet kiddies, which will surely continue to aggravate me in groups, assuming I still continue to play WoW on occasion, When EQ first came out there weren't the great group situations where 4-5 good players, even without optimal classes, could pull off a night of mob slaying with few, if any, deaths; even killing off a few good trains, or named mobs. The tactics took a while for everyone to pick up on at the beginning(although some never did). I hope EQ2 becomes very much like the original in this aspect. It may be too early to tell. Obviously I'm not talking about the endgame guilds who have already worked this stuff out. It takes time for the knowledge to trickle down. It really is too bad that WoW let's you solo all the way to the top, since it ruins the best part about mmorpgs. Basically it might as well be a single player game most of the time. Hell, even Diablo taught you a little bit about grouping, at least w/a merc. I look forward to reading these threads in a couple years.
#432 May 05 2005 at 4:27 AM Rating: Decent
**
560 posts
Happy May 5th lets all drink a beer together.
#433 May 05 2005 at 2:39 PM Rating: Decent
**
976 posts
Ah the myth of WoW being nothing but B.Net kiddies.

Very wrong.

At least on my server it was wrong. I have to honestly say so far Cenarion Circle on WoW has had one of the BEST in game communties I've ever experienced. Probably because it was an RP server of only Med. population. Yes there were a few jerks, but the jerk:cool people ration was like 1:10.

#434 May 06 2005 at 2:13 PM Rating: Default
**
539 posts
How can a person that has never played WoW say something wrong about the game?
What if it is backwards...? what would you feel if someone that have never played or know anything of EQ2 starts saying all the wrong things that game has?

All game have flaws, true, but that's exactly as if I started saying that UO is bad..i dont know..never played it before!!!

But for some of those who say that leveling in WoW is easy....i challenge you to do it....go to one of those PvP servers and see what happens after level 12...lol...
You rather stay in the security given behind a pack of players fighting some monster than fight your way up against real people!! Lol.....

And i know because i played both games..and BTW...i do think the same thing about the WoW PvE servers.
#435 May 06 2005 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent
**
801 posts
Quote:
SWG & EQ2 accounts cancelled because of SOE Exchange Station

Umm... Pasho, there's a post on Page 3 of this thread dated Thu, Jan 20th 9:08PM 2005 where you said
Quote:
I just cancelled my subscription to EQ2 and I'm installing WoW right now....as we speak...

What was that, 3 months before they even announced Station Exchange? Can you give me some stock picks?

Hint: Credibility is worth something.



I seriously hate to keep this thread alive

Edited, Fri May 6 16:26:25 2005 by Lydiaele
#436 May 06 2005 at 4:13 PM Rating: Decent
**
539 posts
I reactivated my accounts because, as i also said, i had a lot of faith in the game... that's why i had both my accounts active along with my WoW account (i kept them active, even if i hadn't time to play because i think that if you like something and you intend to play it later, u have to support it)
Actually i think that EQ2 as a game is a good game..i simply hate the zoning thing and the no-pvp but i know those things might change in time(like the selling item market...i know that you can sell items not having to be inside your room..right?)
What i cant stand is the way SOE manages the game and how they try to squeeze every penny out of you.i.e. I just saw that now players can have two more slots...Do u know how many can i have in the other game?? Up to 50!! limit per server 10. see?? that kind of things drive me mad.
No saying on the exchange server thing. After all the witch hunt they did? now they want the slice of the pie?? lol...come on!!!
#437 May 06 2005 at 11:19 PM Rating: Decent
*
57 posts
Pasho
Quote:

But for some of those who say that leveling in WoW is easy....i challenge you to do it....go to one of those PvP servers and see what happens after level 12...lol...


The leveling is easier is what WoW's players said all the time. Are you saying that they are talking *bull* ? Go through this thread, you will notice WoW player's claiming how easy it is to level in WoW. If you find it challenging in WoW, then EQ2 is definitely not for you...:) It's definitely more challenging fighting real people 10 levels above you or getting outnumbered 6 to 1. Since when poeple on PvP server learned to fight fair. I would be surprised if you don't consider killing someone 10 levels below you or zerging a player with 6 or more people as fun and challenging. I don't want to have any part in that kind of fun and challenge.....:)

Frankly even with 6 slots, I've only used 5 slots. Only 3 characters are actively played. No idea why you ever need more than that. Playing one on Qeynos side and another on Freeport side will allow you to see almost everything in the game. Unless you want to go over those low level quests multiple times. I'm already bored after going over them the second time with an alt.


#438 May 07 2005 at 12:57 AM Rating: Decent
Pash,
I can speak from experience. I started out playing WOW from the day it went live. I love WOW but I got sick of the patching hell I had to go through everytime they decided to release one. So, I switched to EQ 2 and i'm not disappointed.

Now, you say leveling in WOW isn't easy. Why, then, in the four months I played did I have one level 51, a level 46, a level 42, a level 36, several in there twenties. I had every tradeksill covered on each of my alts (this is where I agree with you, more alts should be available in EQ 2 for free), and I had a lot of my tradeskills in the 200 range. All that, in 3 months on a PvE server.

Don't get me wrong, I loved WOW and if I could get the latest patch to work I would probably keep my account for another six months instead of letting it expire in June, but EQ 2 is a much more challenging game. I just hit level 22 with my fury and I feel like I accomplished something. Tradeskilling is deep and rewarding and I love the offline selling. Nothing like walking into your house and hearing the cha-ching sound and tallying up your profits.

So, EQ 2 is a blast, so was WOW, but WOW is definitely easier and I hated the AH in Ironforge, laggy and inconvenient.

But, to each their own.
#439 May 09 2005 at 2:39 PM Rating: Decent
What's amazing to me, on the note of lag in the auction house in Ironforge in WoW, is that even after upgrading to a 256mb GeForce 6800 GT Turbo video card, my friend was playing WoW on my PC the other day and STILL lagged to hell there.

Meanwhile, I play EQ2, which has much smoother and detailed graphics (I am in no way referring to the graphical STYLE, merely the graphical QUALITY), and I don't lag at all on High Quality settings. I can even turn it up to Very High Quality with buildings and trees generating shadows based on sunlight, and things like that, and I get just a little lag. Still not nearly as much as WoW's auction house.

Not anything that should determine whether a person plays one game or another, just an observation I made. It obviously is not a graphical issue that's causing Blizzard that lag, most likely it's just a problem with the method their program uses server-side of keeping track of the auctions, people in a "zone", etc.
#440 May 11 2005 at 9:00 AM Rating: Decent
**
539 posts
To above poster:
no lag in High settings in EQ2? lol...
I know that is not exactly accurate because i went through all that with EQ2 (yes, i have an uber computer-connection-vgrphx)
Saying this does not imply that WoW is lag free... it has serious lag sometimes and although they have worked on that, is still present sometimes.

And when you say "mere graphical quality" that really depends on the users taste. At the begining of this thread i posted that my initial decision of buying EQ2 over WoW was the graphix quality...that i hated the cartoony style of WoW. After playing both games (started with EQ2 btw), my decision changed...I really like more WoW grphx..but that's me.



Edited, Wed May 11 10:02:01 2005 by Pasho
#441 May 11 2005 at 9:10 AM Rating: Decent
**
539 posts
Guys... look at this:

Quote:

Posting on the official forums requires a current EverQuest II subscription. You can read the boards without being a subscriber, but you can't make a post.

If you have a subscription and are unable to log in to the forums, make sure you have registered a forum name. When your forum name is set, click the "Sign In" link in the upper left area of the forums under the EverQuest II logo. Enter your Station name and password, then click the "Save Your Password" box. You should now be logged into the forums.

Be sure to abide by our Rules of Conduct when interacting with others in the community, and take a look at our FAQ section in which you can find answers to many common questions.

To find information on a particular subject, use the SEARCH function at the bottom of the page. Other community members will appreciate it if you search for answers before posting questions.

Welcome to the EverQuest II boards!
===========================
Moorgard
EverQuest II Community Guy


See??
I dont want to make comments on this. Make your own.
#442 May 11 2005 at 10:11 AM Rating: Decent
Pasho,

Sorry, I can't comment on your computer system, but mine runs great on the generic high quality setting. I even had building shadows and such turned on for awhile, but in some cases that did generate a bit of lag, so I ended up turning it off. I'm not saying your system isn't "uber" or whatever, but heck if I know why it lags for you.

With regards to that message from the EQ2 Official Forums, I will point out for the record that you have to be a subscriber to post on the WoW Official Forums also. So this isn't anything either game company is doing differently from the other.

Restricting the users of a forum to those who are participating in the game is a good thing. Sure, some outsiders who might have questions that could possibly convince them to play will not be able to ask those questions. Despite this, the plethora of already answered topics on the forums probably covers their question already anyway if they'd just use the search feature or browse a bit. So really, all the restriction does is keep the forums from having 23548290 of the same questions being asked over and over. Due to the restriction it's a mere 94243 of the same questions being asked over and over. =)
#443 May 11 2005 at 2:01 PM Rating: Default
No No No. You didn't just develop into liking lousy cartoony graphics you liked em to begin with. Must think everyone on this bored is incredibly dim. I had a subscription to both games. Now I have one and I really don't understand how they could even be compared. It reminds me of that goofy cartoony Zelda The Windwacker, except subtract what little challenge there was in that kiddy game and you get WoW. Some people like checkers (more like tic tac toe) (WoW) and some like chess/EQ2.
#444 May 11 2005 at 4:38 PM Rating: Decent
**
976 posts
I liked the WoW graphics for what they were, and they were fun. I'm an artist, I can appreciate more than one style of art/graphics in a game and still think it's fine. I like EQ2's grahpics as well (though I wish there were more variety). I like both games, EQ2 has been "fixed" enough now that I'm enjoying my second go at it... WoW was a great and fun game but I did not want to get into the Honor System mess and have it frustrate me. *shrug*
#445 May 12 2005 at 10:35 AM Rating: Decent
I wouldn't say either game is excessive in graphical variety. WoW had more textures for armor and buildings, but they also recycled buildings alot. Every human-type inn in the game has one of two interiors...most of the dwarven interiors in Ironforge were the same, too. Highlight building, Ctrl+C, go to new zone, Ctrl+V...that's Blizzard's "make a new town in a new zone" scheme. =)

Graphically the main complaints I had about WoW were that they made the females of every race be at least cute, if not "pretty" looking, and the males of every race just seemed haggard looking and tired. Hands are twice as big as your head. I didn't dislike the graphics, though. They were suitable. But I don't think they'll be suitable in two years, though.

EQ2's graphics are a little more bland, but they're also more realistic and in a sense gritty, like their world should be. Azeroth is supposed to be this war-torn world, and I just didn't get that feeling when I played WoW. Everything seemed bright and chipper, even in the Horde lands. EQ2 captures it better, I think...the grim aftermath of apocalypse, where the evil overlord rules from a dark spire suspended in the sky with arcane magicks. The first time I saw that, I was impressed with how "dominating" it seemed.

Each game is good in it's own right, though. Just depends if you graphically prefer gritty realism or cheerful optimism. I'm more the gritty realism type. But seeing as I played WoW for 5 months and didn't leave due to graphics, don't worry about it too much. Be more concerned with gameplay and longevity.
#446 May 14 2005 at 8:21 AM Rating: Decent
I want a game that is hard to master. If you are max level you should feel proud. Feel like you have done something extraordinary.

Leveling is way to fast in both WOW and EQ2 IMO. I never participated in the WOW beta and evrything was new to me when I started. Still I leveled to 60 in less than 4 weeks. And if I started a new character now I think it would be closer to 3 weeks to 60. Since I know good xp-spots for every level and know where to go and what to do.

I leveled to 42 in EQ2 in 4 weeks and I think I would have reached 50 in 5-6 weeks. I had to take a brake from it since most of my friends wanted to play WOW instead. Might start playing EQ2 again if I get to bored with WOW.

IMO it should take at least 4-6 months to get to max level in a MMORPG. And if you are hardcore and get max level after lets say 5 months it should take years for casual players to catch up. That way you feel great pride and feel special.

I also think that most content should be designed for endgame and raids. Eventually most players will be max level and there must be a reason for them to continue playing. Also items that drop in raidzones should be nodrop/BOP. It should not be possible for people that dont raid to buy items of that quality.

I dont think that items in WOW and EQ2 are very interesting or feel like great rewards. I´m a mage in WOW and items/stats makes little difference for casters compared to melee. That is a rather serious problem I have with that game. Not even the best items that drop will help caster dps much. They will have to do something about this.

Items in EQ2 are mostley the same. A higher quality item only have higher stats compared to a lower quality item. But it will be the same stats for the same slot. And different classes to often use the same items. To few items that are class specific. To few options.

Class balance in EQ2 is better compared to WOW. But it´s not strange since most classes are almost the same. EQ2 needs to get more interesting and unique classes. WOW need better balance in general. Characters, casters and melee, must get the same increase in power from better items and higher stats.

So, IMO, EQ2 and WOW are far from perfect. I play them until I can find something better. I hope some of the future games will be the right type of game for me.

Also I would like to say: We play games to have fun. If you have fun and think EQ2 or WOW are fine the way the are it´s good for you. I´m not saying you should want the same things I want or prefer the same things I prefer. If you think a game I would like would be boring and if you dont agree with me I can respect that. But of course I also want to have fun and must try to find the right game for me.

Regards!
#447 May 16 2005 at 8:34 AM Rating: Decent
**
539 posts
To Lorvot,
Excellent post mate. Now that you want hardcore games maybe you should have a look into Irth on-line or Vanguard.
Those two are upcoming MMO and seem to be the way you like. (At least that's what the developers have said in the interviews).

I have just a question: How the hell did u leveled so fast in WoW? level 60 in 4 weeks? I dont know, really... i have been playing for 5 months now and barely I am level 48 still.
Well, i guess i am not that kind of player then :D
#448 May 16 2005 at 3:42 PM Rating: Decent
Pasho,

It depends on how much time you devote to it, I guess. I started WoW, and even factoring in a full time salaried job (so that's 40-50 hours a week) plus college (8 hours a week), a wife, housework, and homework, I still managed to get to 40 in WoW in one month. Granted, I was spending 99% of my actual free time playing, so that factored into it.

I'm playing EQ2 now, and after having the game around a month so far I'm level 19/11. I haven't been playing with 99% of my free time, though, I've had some other hobbies that I've been working on too.

Personally, I like a game that levels slower. I wasn't terribly fond of EQ1's slowness, but that was mainly because I started 3 years into the game, so there were already a bunch of people who had seen/done everything. One of the things I am enjoying about EQ2 is that although there's some high leveled people, they don't seem to be everywhere. The world is still one where there's things to discover, FAQ's that haven't been written, you know?

With an expansion already on the way, I should be nearly strong enough to participate in it by the time it's released. If not, I can just about guarantee that I'll be done with it by the time the next expansion releases, so that will work out nice for me to be able to experience all the new content, as opposed to EQ1 where I wasn't able to participate in 75% of the game even at level 31 or so.
#449 May 16 2005 at 6:27 PM Rating: Decent
**
976 posts
I played WoW for almost 3 months and I got to level 52. I level slowly, I dink around and RP in a game as much as I level so *shrug* how fast you level in any game really does depend on your play style. When I was in FFXI I was definately into grinding exp and probably would have been - to compare- level 60 in WoW in a month. But truthfully EQ2 will level slower, faster than FFXI but a lot slower than WoW especially after level 20. But no big deal, I'll get there when I get there is what I say in regards to "high level"
#450 May 18 2005 at 6:29 AM Rating: Decent
I wanted to get to max level fast because I wanted to be able to raid with my guild.
I played 10-12 hours/day when I leveled to 60 in 4 weeks. 70-80 hours/week.

I dont play that much normally. Only when I level up. I can play like that for a month if I have a goal and think it´s important for me to level as fast as possible. When I´m not leveling I only play 4-6 hours/day. I also need and want to do other things. And cant spend all my time playing games. I can do that for a while if I have to. But not long term.

For me leveling was 50% faster in WOW compared to EQ2. And it feels like leveling is fast in both games.

Regards!
#451 May 18 2005 at 9:53 PM Rating: Decent
not that this matters on this thread; but druid rez in WoW is 1/2 hour...
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 63 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (63)