WardenFollow

Is the warden worth playing or should i look to be a fury instead?

I have not played a Furry so I really cant say much about them but I do play a 24 Warden and love it, I can easily solo and they make great healers, I have a friend who is a furry and he seems to enjoy it equally well but the post above is right the Warden is more a buff group friendly where as the furry is more offensive type back up healer.

Edited, Thu Dec 23 00:39:05 2004 by vorkarlon

Edited, Thu Dec 23 00:43:18 2004 by vorkarlon

Wardens can revive during combat, Furys can't. Their revive spell Natures Touch comes in at lvl 22 and revives a grouop member mid combat BUT WITH ZERO POWER. I was under the impression before hand that it would restore the power amount that my group member would have during death. I was wrong. However there is a slight regen effect upon revival and if you slap on a regrowth they (they meaning the main tank most likely as ANY OTHER NON-MELEE is useless without power) will be back up soon. at 22 i did this to our 750 def Guardian Main tank he was up meleeing soon enough but he couldnt pull aggro but at least he was meleeing. If you plan to use it, it works better with a backup tank ready of course.. inform them about the zero power issue etc.

Before choosing between Fury and Warden i checked spells exhaustively at Ogaming's website and even cheked the other priest subclasses to see if they could revive mid combat. CUrrently they cannot but I would put money and it being implemented in the future . This is beause clerics get a new revive spell that adds a damage shield buff but doesnt work mid combat. Obvisouly, a DS out of combat is useless unless you expect to fight asap. The DS i heard isnt strong either.