Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Thought I was joining.....Follow

#1 Dec 20 2004 at 2:38 AM Rating: Decent
I thought I was joining in on the fun....but apparently my comp does not want to cooperate with the game or me...all of You who have seen the Final Fantasy 11 site know I am Maci on Valefor.

First IT was a graphics card...no prob. I go out and get a new graphocs card ATI Radeon 9k series. Only to find out my Comp and the graphics card do not get a long (I run a AMD). So i was like ok slight set back, went out the next day and got a nVidia GeForce 5200. Yesterday I fight BSOD....today. I got it to work finally, and much to my horror and chagrin the graphics are completely wonky. So I reformat and Reinstall XP, now I am getting crashes and dumps to Desktop. I am not doubting it is a good game but I refuse to play a game that WILL NOT be stable on my comp. Sorry for the rant but I am honestly fed up with this...
#2 Dec 20 2004 at 6:30 AM Rating: Decent
Sorry to hear your having so many problems, but are you sure its EQ and not just your computer in general? Im running eq on my AMD athlon 2600xp and my Pentium 4 2.5ghz Both have 2 gigs of ram and are running Radeon 9600se 128 meg video cards and ive absolutely no problems on either one. Hopefully you'll get it figured out, so far even with no time to play im loving the game.

AoBhaal lvl 14 Shaman, Toxxulia.
#3 Dec 20 2004 at 7:17 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,463 posts
If you end up not being able to fix it, check out Anarchy Online - they offer a FREE year's acct. It's old school now, but it's still a cool game. If u never played it in the old days, it's worth a look. If u played it ages ago, they've worked the bugs out - and - well, I hope u can get yer machine running EQ2. GL.
#4 Dec 20 2004 at 7:21 AM Rating: Default
How much ram do you have?

1GB is the minimum that should be used
if you have less, EQ2 "MAY" be crashing
due to the fact it isn't getting the
required info to load and run the Game.
#5 Dec 20 2004 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
firstly what are your system specs? it's difficult to tech a computer when it's at your desk.. let alone from a text description so specs would help.

secondly, despite the "recommendations" on the game box.. EQ2 has some pretty steep req's for the graphics to be pretty solid looking and maintain an acceptable frame rate.

for the record my specs are:
P4 3.2 ghz 800 mhz FSB
Asus P4P 800 DLX mommyboard
1GB PC3200
Ati Radeon 9600XT
and of course the requisite 7200 RPM drives of stupid size.

normally in EQ2 I run the graphics settings at "Balanced" with cloth simulation on. If I'm in game particularly for taking pictures I'll take it up to "High Quality" with cloth sim on... I *CAN* play it at that mode in most areas (and often do) but if it's a high server load night or if I'm in the more evil zones with respect to lag the HQ setting can stress my box.

Some areas are just evil to systems.. such as the peat bog.. which is where I run "balanced" and it seems to do ok.. fortunately I don't have to go in there for many reasons.
#6 Dec 20 2004 at 11:46 AM Rating: Decent
My Specs

AMD Duron 1200 PRO
Motherboard...ummm...not sure...I think SiS..
1 gig of ram..not sure what variety.
nVidia GeForce FX 5200 from eVGA
and the requisite number of RPM Drives of stupid size I am not sure about.

All I know is this much. I have done everything that they suggested I do downlaod the new drivers and stuff like that. I have no clue of what else to do...

Edited, Mon Dec 20 11:47:29 2004 by Argentlupus
#7 Dec 20 2004 at 11:52 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
How much ram do you have?

1GB is the minimum that should be used
if you have less, EQ2 "MAY" be crashing
due to the fact it isn't getting the
required info to load and run the Game.
Codswhollop, i am running 2 PCs with 512 RAM one of which is on Dial-up, If you have 512 RAM you can run the game with almost zero lag in the Xp zones.
#8 Dec 20 2004 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
***
1,930 posts
I'll have to second that it's not RAM that's the problme. I do have 1GB but when I only had 512 it ran fine. Just zone times were longer.

I would say most likely it is still your video card. Being the 5200 non-ultra would be considered a "low-end" card. Not knocking your stuff just saying, it might be mid-level elsewhere but when it comes to EQ2 it's low-end.

Consider taking it back and getting at least a 5700 Ultra which I know works perfectly.. As that is what I have.

2.8 HTT
1 GB RAM 400Mhz
128 MB 5700 Ultra
#9 Dec 20 2004 at 12:22 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
for the record my specs are:
AMD Duron 1200 PRO
Motherboard...ummm...not sure...I think SiS..
1 gig of ram..not sure what variety.
nVidia GeForce FX 5200 from eVGA
and the requisite number of RPM Drives of stupid size I am not sure about.


hmm.. only thing I see in there that could be a problem of note is the processor itself.. the Duron is a solid processor but it's not nearly as strong as the Athlon XP's or Athlon 64's...

will EQ2 run? yes.. but due to the processor I simply cannot guess what the graphics will look like.. only machine I've ever seen it running on slower than mine was a 2.8 P4.. which isn't much slower and that box had the 9800 Pro 256 and 1GB of Corsair Ram which EASILY made up the speed difference. That said.. let's see...

you've dl'ed drivers, how about updating DirectX? sometimes that is helpful with new drivers.

what OS are you running? if it's windows XP and you have SP2, the security features of the firewall in SP2 *can* prevent online games from connecting if it's setup too strict.. it's something to look into if you're running WINXP SP2.

I know you're not 100% certain of the motherboard model.. but if you can somewhat easily figure it out.. perhaps the maker of the board has firmware updates available for download?

just posing possibilities.. anywho, hopefully it's something simple like directX or a windowsupdate download.

good luck.

edit: OHH yes and check your video card with the main EQ2 site.. there are a few cards (most notibly the Nvidia 440MX) that don't work with EQ2.. a friend of mine had to update his card and I told him to get a radeon, he's running a 9200 now and says it does fairly well.

Edited, Mon Dec 20 12:24:11 2004 by Iaini
#10 Dec 20 2004 at 12:34 PM Rating: Decent
Well...I installed Battlefield 1942 today..and was getting the same graphic glitches. So I ma thinking it may be the processor. I have to run an experiment tonight with my techs permission....
#11 Dec 20 2004 at 9:08 PM Rating: Decent
i'm just adding my input after reading this thread...

i am running an Nvidia GForce FX 5200 also but i have had the game running for hours with absolutely no crashes. in fact, i've never crashed.
as far as system specs, i'm running an AMD Athlon 64 3200, 768MB DDR 2700 ram, ECS 755A mobo, 550watt power supply, Win XP Pro SP2, all the latest drivers and patches

i'm gonna take a shot in the dark and say it is your processor. i used to have crashes with certain games, ie. Morrowind cause of the high end graphics. even when i dummied it down, i would still get crashes. that is, until i upgraded my mobo and processor.

just my 2cp
#12 Dec 20 2004 at 9:30 PM Rating: Decent
Well Ladies and getns I have come to you a changed person, I have figured out it is my Motherboard and Processor...I want to stay AMD just so you all know. Ran it on a test machine in the house.

AMD that processes a 2 gigs
60 gig hard drive
512 ram
and the same video card GeForce 5200 FX

And it ran perfectly...granted the back ground did drop out a few times but hey I got it to work...now... to get the motherboard and processor....that will be amost 300....hoo boy...
#13 Dec 21 2004 at 12:05 PM Rating: Decent
Most of it seems system problems to me, but anyhow. 1200 AMD Duron, your barely meeting minimums here I think, but should be ok, my main concern was the Nvidia card and your problems with the AMD... what kind of AGP port do you have? Video cards might not be getting the juice they need, unlikely but possible. 2nd, My friend tried to run it on a 1200 AMD system with an NVidia and had tons of problems, we think its the video drivers, he said NVidia is aware of the problem and working on it, but I think he has a Geforce 4 line of cards.
#14 Dec 21 2004 at 2:47 PM Rating: Decent
A 5200 is barely playable with a AMD 2100+ 512 Megs PC333 DDR, wit 7200 RPM drive. I have to have all the setting minimum and have extreme lag in video at times. Trust me you need better than a Geforce5200.

Etau
#15 Dec 21 2004 at 5:21 PM Rating: Good
I have no problems with my 5200. That doesn't mean that I don't want to upgrade (and intend to sometime after christmas), but it's hardly unplayable.
#16 Dec 21 2004 at 10:04 PM Rating: Decent
good
cuz im currently running a 5200 and im gettin the game this weekend

ill keep my fingers crossed for the playability =)
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 146 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (146)