Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

What's the difference between fury and warden?Follow

#1 Dec 16 2004 at 7:39 PM Rating: Decent
*
85 posts
Read the title^^
#2 Dec 16 2004 at 7:42 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,246 posts
I believe one is more offensive and the other defensive.
#3 Dec 16 2004 at 8:19 PM Rating: Decent
*
57 posts
I am a 32 fury, and I believe the fury gets more offense than the warden, the warden is more group friendly.
#4 Dec 16 2004 at 8:59 PM Rating: Decent
*
85 posts
thanks and not to hijack my own thread (lol) but would a kerra warden or fury be ok?
#5 Dec 17 2004 at 10:44 AM Rating: Decent
*
62 posts
Quote:
thanks and not to hijack my own thread (lol) but would a kerra warden or fury be ok?


Sure, it would. Kerra don't have the highest WIS but it's not bad either. Just make sure you get all the +WIS you can on equipment and you'll be fine.

Only stat that looks bad for Kerra is INT. I definitely would not go for a mage kerra. There has been some questions as to whether or not INT plays a role in priests DD spells but, personally, I never go for INT boosts and my DD spells do respectable damage (for a priest).
#6 Dec 17 2004 at 3:56 PM Rating: Decent
Yeah, Wardens are more defense based and focus on group buffs for an aray of stats. And Furies are more offensive based. They get more damage spells and attack bonus buffs than Wardens, not to mention their one spell to turn party members into mountain lions (which also buffs attack and other specs). It took me a week to decide I wanted to go Warden. *huggles my puppy*
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 96 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (96)