Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Americans...no fun :PFollow

#52 Nov 30 2004 at 11:31 PM Rating: Decent
>>>I sincerely hope the mistakes of my government do not injure or destroy good relationships with Great Britain. Sadly, we share an evershrinking cultural, historical, and religious bond with this country, and the neo-conservative warhawks are now straining the political ties which have for over half a century promised mutual security.<<<

If you are implying 'by my government' to indicate that you believe the US has made any substantial mistakes, you, sir, are almost totally wrong.

The only mistake we made was back in 1991 by honoring the letter of the UN Resolution that permitted us to drive Hussein out of Kuwait only. We should have finished the job then and there and spared the lives of something on the order of 350,000 Iraqis that Saddam exterminated since then. We allowed the feckless and corrupt debating society run by socialists and idiots that is the UN to dictate to us what we could and could not do. Never again.

You wonder why the 'world' is so against us? Or at least seems to be so? Read up on what is rapidly emerging as the greatest international scandal since the Holocaust- the UN Oil For Food program. We now know that senior governmental and business leaders throughout Europe- especially our dear, dear friends the French- were being paid off with huge sums of money to, at best, look the other way when Saddam either skimmed billions (looks like $20 billion plus) off the top for himself and his depraved family or, at worst, actually facilitated the deals that allowed Saddam to acquire weapons denied him by the cease-fire of the first Gulf War. Is it any wonder that Schroder, Chirac and Putin were so against us ending their little get-rich-quick scheme? Since the media is largely, if not completely, State-controlled in those countries, it reports with the approved Governmental slant if it expects to continue reporting at all. Frankly, I'll take friends like the English, the Poles, the Italians. the Australians and the like over these corrupt men leading France and Germany.

If you're speaking to the Weapons of Mass Destruction that we haven't found- yet- then, again, check the news. We've found labs that were built to add Anthrax spores to improvised explosive devices. We've found artillery shells that had traces of the nerve agent Sarin. And we haven't yet been able to investigate just what was in the steady flow of trucks that, in the days and weeks before the war, sped toward Syria. I might point out to you that Bush was far from the only world leader to believe that Saddam had WMDs. Even the feckless UN believed it was so even before Powell made his presentation. Blair believed it. So did Chirac. And Schroeder. Putin too. Somehow, all of those people (save Blair) have gotten a pass for being wrong (if they were indeed wrong, which I don't believe for a minute). Bush alone is held responsible. More evidence of, in this case, an international double standard when it comes to Leftists versus Conservatives.

Bush is a rarity among politicians: he says exactly what he means and means exactly what he says. There's no 'nuance' to it. It's really refreshing after what we went thru in the previous Administration. Clinton was much more Internationalist in his views and shared many traits with Chirac and Shroeder: he was thoroughly corrupt, totally dishonest and manifestly greedy. And you wonder why they got along so well?

I'm of the opitnion that much of the world owes US an apology because, once again, they sought to cuddle up to Dictators and to appease Tyrants rather than standing up to them. You'd have thought that the example of Chamberlain and Daldier prior to World War Two would have taught Old Europe the futility of taking that road. Sadly, some people (and nations) seem not to learn from their mistakes. Fortunately for them, the United States isn't one of those.
#53 Nov 30 2004 at 11:36 PM Rating: Good
You are in the wrong guild. Try a new one!
#54 Dec 01 2004 at 12:00 AM Rating: Good
Holy crap, this thread got out of hand. One observation and it devolves into a history discussion. I think some of you proved his original point.
#55 Dec 01 2004 at 3:24 AM Rating: Decent
**
786 posts
Im American and Im all about off the wall crazy s***. Its just the person not the nationality, cuz if that was the case I could say all French people are cowards (no offense meant to ne French people. HUGS!) cuz of WWII. Only take a person for what they are worth and dont stretch it for the whole group. You just got a bad guild try another or go guildless (I am currently.)

And Adiemus about that history lesson, theres more to that batch of warmed over history that people force feed us then your saying (or know possibly). The world has more problems then that with us, not just the things you listed (not saying you arent right about most of it.) And we said they had WMDs because we gave them WMDs (gases) when Saddam was in a bitter dispute with Iran (we originaly backed Saddam) in the '80s, so when we said he had them we thought it would be simple to prove but its turned into a big pain now without finding any random barrels of sarin (the labs arent enough, lots of things can be made in a lab so people are cautious to jump to conclusions). Anyway enough of that.

Edited, Wed Dec 1 03:27:51 2004 by WasteOfSpace

Edited, Wed Dec 1 03:27:53 2004 by WasteOfSpace
#56 Dec 01 2004 at 3:32 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
For example, as for the "cookie cutter" comment, the reason that a person with an odd job/subjob combination, or a person with bad gear can't get a party is simple. They don't help the party as much as someone who has good gear and a "cookie cutter" (a.k.a. "not retarded") job combo. You have to learn to put the party before your independent spirit and resist the urge to take a stupid job.
The nail that stands up will be immediately hammered down, eh? This is exactly the mentality that will suck the fun out of this, or any game where it's tolerated.

I group up with my friends, and maybe their friends, and whoever they happen to drag along, or perhaps these people I just met who seem pretty fun. Do they have the best gear and the best stats? I neither know, nor care. If we're all competent players, it makes very little difference in the long run. Good players know how to adapt.

As for the lack of humor the OP talks about, you might have just landed with a stick-in-the-mud guild. I also have a feeling once we all become more comfortable with the mechanics of the game, the chat will pick up. I'm normally very chatty and crack a lot of jokes, but now I'm so busy button pushing it cuts into my chat time. Smiley: wink
#57 Dec 01 2004 at 11:06 AM Rating: Decent
*rolls eyes* is this what people talk about here? Good lord. lol as much as I hate going off topic (This IS an EQ2 board right? hehe) I gotta reply to the school thing....

Religious schools are NOT the best schools. I home school my three kids and they are ALL well above thier "grade" level working on thier own and with great pride. Mom and Dad are the BEST teachers for kids (who taught them how to walk, talk, feed themselves use the potty and social skills????) not some religious freak who puts thier idea of "god" into every lesson...... people wanna be religious more power to em, I think it should not be put into your every lesson.... besides the religious schools around here teach that dinosaurs never exsisted and the world started when the bible said so, not what science says..... I think I'll teach my kids the truth in science thank you very much.

But yeah, we should be able to choose where our kids goto school and not be forced into a school just because we live closer to it.
#58 Dec 01 2004 at 11:32 AM Rating: Decent
LETS MAKE LOVE! NOT WAR!
#59 Dec 01 2004 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
I'm so sorry. I didnt mean to start all this. Please forgive me!

Minky
#60 Dec 01 2004 at 11:48 PM Rating: Decent
Izzozz, I'd agree with you on that Americans, as a whole, lack a fun and zany sense of humor.

Just the fact that your post got so many flames is a testament to that - so many are simply incapable of taking a joke.

It didn't used to be like that, but a few bad things happened a few years ago, and far too many Americans responded by becoming miserable, fearful, angry, dull, over-sensitive, and humorless people.

I've noticed this on EQ2 as well. I mostly play during the evening, when mostly Americans are on, and /ooc is filled with nothing but newbie questions and people getting mad because no one's answering their newbie questions. It goes along with that whole sense of self-entitlement that's such a part of the American identity.

But a few times I played during the very early morning, when a lot of Australians were on, and I noticed that zone chat became a lot funnier and more interesting - people cracking jokes, laughing, telling funny stories, and generally acting liked they ENJOYED what they're doing. I certainly noticed the difference.

(Oh yeah, and I'm an American.)
#61 Dec 02 2004 at 12:32 AM Rating: Decent
**
786 posts
Izzozz its cool we all just needed to vent. Your getting flamed because you said Americans dont have a sense of humor. If I put that *insert nationality* has no sense of humor, everyone of them would flame me into oblivion. Dont say you wouldnt because all of us take this as a direct on oneself. Alot of Americans have sense of humors you just need to remember that theres so many Americans playing that you have a bigger chance getting stuck with the sticks in the mud. I dont care what anyone says, everyone has their bad seeds.
#62 Dec 02 2004 at 4:46 AM Rating: Default
Totally agree with you Minky. I am Persian American (yeah that country that is part of the Axis of EVIL)that has spent 10 years in one way or another in the American military. I am getting sick of these tubby lazy americans that talk ignorantly about other countries and Nationalities. Look if you havn't walked a mile in their shoes keep your mouth shut. I would like to congrat Minky on standing up for himself and I would like the majority of Americans to Wise up, Smile on your brother, Everybody get together and try to love one another, Right now(good song)

As far as Bush winning the election, I sure hope that that 50% of the populace plans on signing up for the draft to spport thier president, otherwise America will start losing wars and soilders. I persoannly am tired of seeing white Americans send the poor minorities to fight thier wars for them while they sit at home sipping on thier mommys tit..lol. If you didn't vote or voted for Bush and don't plan on signing up, I hope you get drafted. Oh by the way when you die you can't be revived. As for me I'll be here in my house in Iowa cause I have already been though the regular army, been deployed, and killed for the right of all americans to be not funny in EQ2(lol)

I stand aside my Bloody Brit Brother and hope to see him someday on the Permafrost server.

Moadeb 20 Wizzy
Healinghammer 10 Cleric
Rustam 12 War
#63 Dec 02 2004 at 4:49 AM Rating: Good
I'm not offended, and have not been offended at any point in this thread. I was just apologising for dropping a thread in that turned into a political/historical argument (though the explanation of Bomber Harris was interesting).

I think I just have to come to the conclusion that the sense of humour displayed in EQ is just developing as people find their feet and as I happen to be on an American server I have attributed any misgivings to Americans. I do agree that Europeans (and yes, Australians) have a more warped sense of humour, in public anyway...and that's definitely from my experience of having visited about 17 European countries and the US and having lived in Bosnia, UK, France and Luxembourg often with Americans...so I would say I have a pretty decent experience in this. And I have to admit that I did get quite a reputation on a neighbouring American Base in Tuzla (bosnia) for being a little bit loco...but always fun to be around...so I guess it wasnt lost on the chaps from the US.

Here's hoping it isn't lost on some of my fellow EQ'ers :)

Peace out!
#64 Dec 02 2004 at 7:23 AM Rating: Decent
**
786 posts
Im tired of a******* saying all white people are rich and send the minoritys to fight our wars. Im white....and Im no where near rich nor is my family you jacka$$. I nor any other "white" person forces anyone white or otherwise to sign up for the military, you do it by your own free will.

I didnt vote, because of f*** up on my part. Should I die because I messed up you twit? HUH?!?!? Should I?!? I didnt like Bush and would have voted against him. So am I worthy in your almighty eyes to not be drafted and live God? Heh....***** you.

I hope to god Im taking this entirely the wrong way.......if not I hope I never meet you in person....Im sooo p*****.

(OMG the last part was offensive to many so its gone.....for good...wrote it in the heat of the moment.)

Edited, Thu Dec 2 07:26:23 2004 by WasteOfSpace
#65 Dec 02 2004 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
*
78 posts
I really dont care if you like americans or not >.> Im just responding to the historical references. Hitler seeked peace with england cuz he knew he made a mistake by bringing germany in a 2 sided war and wanted to concentrate on stablizing oil lines east. The control of british airspace was due to american financial support. The RAF,and england in general, was pretty much beaten up financially due to the long years of war. Luckly Germany stop bombing strategic positions and landing zones in england because hitler was insulted when a british raid hit german resident cities and he fired back the same way which lifted up the pressure off the landing zones and other strategic positions. He made the mistake of making war personal. Sure operation sealion might of never came about but what turned the war back inland europe was due to american support and mass production...not tatics but waves of soldiers and tanks ><. The sad thing is america should of entered the war a long time ago but did not do so till germany declared war on america and declaration of war with japan.
#66 Dec 02 2004 at 10:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
494 posts
Quote:
I am getting sick of these tubby lazy americans that talk ignorantly about other countries and Nationalities.


Quote:
I persoannly am tired of seeing white Americans send the poor minorities to fight thier wars for them while they sit at home sipping on thier mommys tit..lol.


Aside from the fact that you are probably referring to U.S. citizens, and not "Americans" in general (There are American continents, as in more than one), I would like to just say that you, sir, have a seriously skewed idea of Americans (read: U.S. citizens).

https://www.patrick.af.mil/deomi/Observances%20&%20Demographics/Deomographics/Demographics_2004_03.pdf

(just copy and paste that, this site doesnt like linking to secure (https) documents.)

As you can see, 64.6% of current Active Duty Forces are "white". Please do research before you slam another country/race/religion/etc... because if you dont, it just makes you look like a fool.

Thanks-

Edited, Thu Dec 2 10:18:08 2004 by gxm

Edited, Thu Dec 2 10:20:28 2004 by gxm
#67 Dec 02 2004 at 10:25 AM Rating: Decent
**
494 posts
If the link up there still doesn't work, follow this and go to "Demographics September 2004"

https://www.patrick.af.mil/deomi/Observances%20&%20Demographics/Deomographics/Demographics_Index.htm
#68 Dec 02 2004 at 10:25 AM Rating: Decent
wow good job round of applause for the douches in this thread
#69 Dec 02 2004 at 10:37 AM Rating: Decent
*
167 posts
Hey you guys have a problem go on the "Out of Topic" forum for what this post is worth...



Edited, Thu Dec 2 10:42:55 2004 by GilgameshAngelic
#70 Dec 02 2004 at 7:16 PM Rating: Decent
Let me offer an apology to anyone that I might've offended in my replies to this thread. Such was not my intent. I just hate to see manifestly incorrect assertions and outright lies put forth as being the truth simply because the poster (NOT his fault) hasn't been exposed to a dissenting opinion. If you seek knowledge only from people who lean to the Left, you're almost certainly going to adopt their opinion >IF< you don't actively try to seek out the other side, Academia in the US (and elsewhere, apparently) being what it is. I went to college 20 years ago and it was a tiny bit better then for anyone who leans Right but I did have my scores penalized on subjective testing or assignments because I didn't toe the line with my professors' opinions. Also, being an ex-debator, sometimes I just can't help taking up the argumentative mantle. You won't catch me personally insulting anyone, even if I have ample opportunity and cause, because that isn't the way to get your point across. Logic beats emotion (or at least it should).

We (the US) did support Hussein in the 1980s in his war against Iran. At that point, Hussein was the lesser of two evils (Khomeini of Iran being the other). Iran had captured our Embassy in Tehran and held Americans hostage for 444 days. So it's pretty apparent which side we thought was the greatest threat. Also, Hussein ran a, for lack of a better term, 'casual' Islamic nation- certainly much less strict than the near-Theocracy of Iran. We thought we could control Hussein or, at least, buy him off with weapons and other aid. In retrospect, that was idiocy of the highest order made all the worse by giving him WMDs in the form of lethal gases. I think the world of Ronald Reagan but this will and should tarnish his legacy. The only luck to come out of it is that he didn't use the gas on Israel (which probably would have resulted in Israel dropping a nuke on Baghdad and igniting a much more widespread war in the Middle East) or on us in either conflict.

On the subject of education: frankly, I'm jealous of any family that can arrange themselves so as to be able to home-school their kids. You're absolutely right that yeilds the best education for the child because all parties have a real investment in a successful outcome- a situation that, with respect to Government schools, may or may not exist. If you're willing to make the lifestyle sacrifices that allow you to home school, all the better for you. I'm just saying that, when given the option between a typical Government school and a typical religious school, studies invariably show that the child is better served in the religious school. I know that I was.



As for Americans being 'no fun' within the EQ2 game, I'm going to put that charge down as an overgeneralization because there are exceptions (myself being one, though you might not readily believe it. If you see a ratonga running around quoting Monty Python on the Najena server, it's me).

I'd agree that you just signed up with the wrong Guild to suit your personality. These guys might well be 'minimaxers' (minimum effort/maximum reward) or just obsessed with advancing as fast as they possibly can whereas you take a more leisurely approach (for what it's worth, I feel the same way. take time and smell the roses, as it were). I think I'd look elsewhere for Guilding.
#71 Dec 02 2004 at 7:26 PM Rating: Decent
*
123 posts
lol even when people dont respond when you say Hi.... you cant say "all americans cannot laugh" ... just some people are eh.. dull? Anyway, hope you get a better guild :)
#72 Dec 02 2004 at 8:21 PM Rating: Decent
*
211 posts
A bad generalization made from bad company.

People are blowing this wayy overboard. He's simply had a negative experience with the Americans he's met. If you disagree you should be trying to prove otherwise, not become serious and flame him into oblivion. Most of the efforts on this forum seem to only reinforce his mistaken generalizations.

On the other side, the original poster should not make sweeping generalizations about a group of people simply from the experience of a few. I happen to know many people in EQ2 who are a joy to hang around with (my guild members), and most of them live in the US. We've had many 'interesting' conversations on Guild chat. But I've also met many fun people from the UK, Australia, Sweden, Norway, and many other places. Does this mean there are less 'fun' people everywhere else? No, I just haven't met as many yet.

I like to advance as much as the next person, but as soon as I start getting obsessed about it I take a step back because it's just not fun any more.
#73 Dec 02 2004 at 9:04 PM Rating: Default
hey you can go shuv a 10 foot pole up your butt you stuiped dirty commie. my dad servered 3 tours of duty in vietnam and is now over in iraq right now. he's white........ i my self am planing on joining the army as soon as i become of age. (only 17) and as soon as i do i hope i see your dirty persian *** over in iraq geting turned into hamburger. since you think we send all our minoritys over to iraq to fight our wars then why dont we round up all the spiks in florida and send them on over to iraq???? (they mostly cuban criminals enyway) my famile has died for this country over the past 130 years. my dad would have voted but no one on the ballot was werthy of voting for. as for the french well i have nothing but respect for finally geting some balls and doing what they think is right. britian is still bent over and we are still *** ******* them like some prision *****. as for ww2. well what could the french have done? they were over whelmed with supior tactics. (the use of concentrated use of tanks, mechanized infantry, and close air suport.) what people keep forgeting is that in 814 A.D. the franks. aka. the french controlled all of europe and were working on russia. then in 1814 the french under napoleion controlled of europe once again and were working on russia once again. sao dont diss the french there country and nationality has existed alot longer than we have even thought of being a country. so stop being such a stuiped bush fan. all hes gona do is send you into iraq cvuz hes to muhc of ***** to go there him self and fight his own god damn war.
#74 Dec 02 2004 at 10:06 PM Rating: Decent
*
133 posts
You WANT flames? Ok, I for one American (with zero to be ashamed of and everything to be proud of being so) would be happy to pay an extra $1 a month not to have to play with or hear whining europeans.

And that goes for Alla too. :)
#75 Dec 02 2004 at 10:11 PM Rating: Good
Vermont:

Whoa there son...calm down. The Army won't take you if you give yourself a coronary and have heart trouble.

My family doesn't go as far back in defending the US as yours does. We came over from Germany just after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870. My Great-Grandfater was in the Spanish-American War around the turn of the century. My Dad and his three brothers served in WW2 (two participated in D-Day) and several of their sons served alongside your Dad in Vietnam (Navy and Air Force). I myself was too young for Vietnam and too old for the Gulf War.

War is and always has been the old(er) sending the young out to fight and die for whatever the cause happens to be. Some wars are fought for good reasons that are obvious to all (like WW2), some are fought for what doesn't appear at first to be the best of reasons but turns out to be so (Korea comes to mind and Iraq will prove to fall into this category, some are fought for what appears to be the best of reasons but turns out not to be so (Vietnam) and some are fought for obviously the wrong reasons (WW1). The single hardest duty in war is to send someone out to do a task in which they could die. I wouldn't want that kind of responsibility and I'd bet that most people wouldn't either. George W. Bush is trying to spread the concept of freedom to a region of the globe that is almost totally unfamiliar with the concept, as well as trying to remove a potential threat to the US. Spreading freedom is a noble goal in just about any instance you could name, but it remains to be seen if the Iraqi people themselves are willing to fight for that goal. So far, I'm rather pessimistic.

You make a couple of good points about the military history of the French. However, the most recent example of competent leadership you can name is circa 1815. The Franks were more Teutonic (Germanic) than French actually, but I'll conceed the point because most of the fighting to which you refer occurred on what is now French soil (Portiers and Charles Martel against the Muslims) Since then, about the only thing you can learn militarily from the French is how to plan poorly, execute said poor plan even more poorly and capitulate in near-record time. Napoleon III fought an abysmally poor war against the Prussians in 1870. WW1 turned into a stalemate only because the Germans failed to follow their own war plan (the Von Schlieffen plan); had they stuck to the plan, France would've been defeated by the second month of the war. And we all know what happened in mid-1940.

Could the French have done anything differently? Well, considering that the Germans basically copied their war plan for 1940 from their war plan of 1914, yes they could've. If they doubted Kaiser Wilhelm would've observed Dutch/Belgian neutrality in 1914, why then would they expect Hitler to do so in 1940? They saw what the Blitzkreig did to Poland and had reason to expect that Germany would attempt the same thing against them (in fact, the Low Countries and NE France offer better terrain for tank warfare than did Poland). Yet they decided to dig in behind a static defensive barrier (the Maginot Line) that just begged to be outflanked or bypassed thru the Ardennes Forest. Sorry, but the track record of the French over the past 190 years in terms of warfare has been abysmal.

I respect them as a people because they have done great things in the course of their civilization, not the least of which was helping us to win our War of Independence. I have no problem with any country being in opposition to the US policy >IF< the reasons are above board and honest (which test the French fail miserably because of the Oil For Food fiasco). Disagreement and dissent are fine; actively supporting the enemy and seeking at every turn to undermine a supposed ally isn't.
#76 Dec 03 2004 at 3:15 AM Rating: Decent
**
786 posts
Well at least Im not the only one who was offended by that d*** and not afraid to speak up about it. Heh.....he really p***** me off with those comments. Once again...***** you.

Heh....Maginot Line...such an ill conceived plan. Poor France has been very inept militarily for around 200 years. The Maginot Line is a grand botch that pretty well sums up their military track record since around Napolean.

*cheers* Heres to the French finally growing some balls. Hopefully the military shapes up too. 8)
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 112 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (112)