Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Eye-candy Tease, know what I mean?Follow

#1 Nov 29 2004 at 8:31 AM Rating: Good
I just have to say this. First, I love EQ II! I left FFXI for it and as of yet I see no turning back. I can't get enough of the crafting system, (even though no one is really buying all my great furniture yet...lol, too soon in the game), I thoroughly enjoy not being 'required' to be in a party to progress, even though it's a lil slower. It's a fantastic experience gameplay-minded.

But, and I really mean "BUT"...I'm horrified by the graphical error with this game. I have 2 machines, one for me and one for my wife. She has the newer, yet not-so-brawny machine, and I have an older, but beefy setup. It's sad, that even with a 2+ GHz processor, 1gig of Dual Channel DDR2 memory, and a 128mb PCI Express Vid Card, that I have to have my Game Settings on "Extreme Performance", losing the majority of the rendered Eye-Candy (and sometimes I'm just a naked Rat...) and all the goodies of the game. I can't even see the spells being casted, the settings are so low. Status effects, like being on fire from a flame spell? Nope...don't see it. All I see, is my sword swinging, their sword swinging, and that's about it. Nevermind the fact that while swinging, my equip disappears because my machine can't render it fast enough.

I play any other game (aside from Doom 3) and have absolutely no problems. In fact, the Vid card in my machine is brand new (had to upgrade for EQII) and I still can't enjoy it in a "balanced" setting. My Wifes machine, 3GHz Proc/512mb DDR2/128mb PCI Exp Vid...(very very similar setup, just less ram than me and more proc power) runs it like a dream. I don't know if it's the Pentium over my AMD, or what. But it's almost sad sitting there, getting about 10% of the graphical charm on my machine.

So although I'll say "Thanks SoE" for an awesome game, I'll say "Dammit SoE!!!" for making a game that requires the top of the line PC setup to enjoy to the fullest. I'd have to fork up basically at least another $300+ to get it running better...which is just a lil sad. ><
#2 Nov 29 2004 at 9:03 AM Rating: Decent
*
85 posts
There might be another issue with your Machine, I'm running on a 1.6 GHZ p4 with a 128MB Geforce fx 5600, I had 512PC2100 RAM but I've since upgraded to 784, I can't run it at peak, but it still runs pretty good. for the most part the only thing I'm missing is shadows and some of the more specular foliage effects.
#3 Nov 29 2004 at 9:15 AM Rating: Decent
*
121 posts
I do know what you mean, I upgraded (bought a new machine actually) just for this (and a few other)game. With a 3Ghz processor, 1 gig of ram, and an Nvidia 6800 I can run it at the second highest setting without much problem until I get inside of Qeynos, at such time I need to dumb it down to one of the performance levels or suffer the lagging conswquences. Seems like its not been build to run on the current generation of machines, rather is setup for stuff that has yet to come out.
#4 Nov 29 2004 at 9:16 AM Rating: Decent
Yep, sounds like your having a problem. I'm running 2.1Ghz, 512 Ram (yes I need to upgrade) & a 64 bit Geo 4200 Ti card & I run with pretty much medium everything & have fauna on. I get laggy in some spots, such as the hell that South Qeynos is (too many groups of guards walking in groups), but in most cases I'm fine.

I see all effects, combat arts & what have you. I can't imagine not seeing these, as it would take too much out of the game.
#5 Nov 29 2004 at 9:45 AM Rating: Good
No kidding! I love the effects shown with Mage and Priest spells, they are rather spectacular. Not getting to see these on my machine is torture. I guess I'm going to have to look into something, as it's going to result in upgrades to fix the problem. FFXI runs on my machine like it was born on the hard drive...smooth as can be with no problems at all. It's suprising to see the load handled so differently between the games.
#6 Nov 29 2004 at 10:16 AM Rating: Decent
My 2.6 P4 system with 1GB of ram and a GeForce4 Ti 4200 128MB card runs pretty well in balanced mode, with a little drag sometimes in the city or big fights. I've got a new system coming with a 3.0 P4, 1GB, 256MB GeForce card and a nice fast SATA drive, so I hope that solves the problem.

Keep in mind though all the graphical upgrades EQ1 went through, and the ******** involved with that. Makes sense to me to design the game to work on the best of what's available now, and forstall upgrading the graphics engine for as long as possible. In another year or so the bargain basement PCs will be running this like nothing :)
#7 Nov 29 2004 at 10:38 AM Rating: Decent
43 posts
try this out. it might help.
http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=tech_support&message.id=3265&page=1
#8 Nov 29 2004 at 11:14 AM Rating: Good
***
2,268 posts
Yeah, I didn't realize myself how beautiful it was till I went home this weekend. My parents recently bought a new, top of the line computer (no idea why... They need to word process faster, I guess.) By top of the line I mean 1 Gig RAM, 3.4 P4, and a Radeon x800. The game was BEAUTIFUL! I mean I'm not sure if I can go back to my old machine beautiful.

My machine consists of 512 MB RAM, Athlon XP 2500+, and a GeForce4 TI-4600. I get serious lag in anything but Antonica, and sometimes there too. If I play for more than 15 minutes, it takes me 3+ minutes to zone. I'm going to upgrade to 1 Gig of ram very soon, and hopefully that'll help the problem. If not, the graphics card is next.

But yeah, it is one of the most beautiful games I've ever seen. I can't wait to see what those next gen graphics cards can do with it.
#9 Nov 29 2004 at 11:37 AM Rating: Default
It's not the game, it's your comp. I have a 1.8 gigz, 512 ram, with 128 meg vid card, and I can play the game on high performance, with character texture and spell particles on MAX without hardly any lag.. till I hit a city. I have 512 more ram coming, and I expect it to run fine. But anyways, I have half what you have, and I can see everything, and my clothes don't dissapear =p.
#10 Nov 29 2004 at 12:12 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,576 posts
Silly question but have you defrag'd lateley? You have the older computer and a much higher chance of having fragmented files. I defragged recently and it made a world of difference (watch your HDD light, you'll be surprised about the amount of swapping that goes on, even with 1+gig of RAM). You might also consider increasing your swap file (virtual memory).

[edit]

One more thing, try disabling your virus scan software. Just see if it helps. It can add a lot of overhead to the HDD access for some games.

Edited, Mon Nov 29 12:14:58 2004 by subvert
#11 Nov 29 2004 at 12:54 PM Rating: Good
Definately, I defrag on a regular basis (usually once a week or so, if not more). Actually defragged it over this past weekend. The system has been cleared of all the junk we don't play anymore, and cleaned up. IMO it is a pretty decent setup, but it just is surprisingly slow and unable to handle the game in a balanced setting. Quite possibly could just be that it's a POS and I need to do a overhaul (which is basically what is coming down to...not much money involved in swapping in a new MB, new Processor, and a new stick of Memory).

If anyone has any other suggestions, they're appreciated!
#12 Nov 29 2004 at 12:55 PM Rating: Decent
*
96 posts
Hmm I am not sure if the fault is on yourside - i have 2ghz athlon, 1 gig ram dul ddr channel and used to have gf4 ti 4200 128mb I could play but with serious lag. I took geforce fx 5700 128mb from my friend jsut to see minimal improvement, tommorow I am gonna buy 256mb gf fx we will see if there is any improvement...
But I agre on the subject I put my details on highest possible, textures and models as well just to see hwo the models look and I fainted - beatiful !!!
#13 Nov 29 2004 at 1:29 PM Rating: Default
i am warning you dont get a GeForce FX. eq2 will not suport the fx line of video cards. when i went to comp usa to get a new video card (i had a 32bit GeForce2) i looked up the suported video cards and they spesificly said that the fx line was not suported. I went and got me a 256 GeForce4 Ti 6300. but i am using a p3 (1.9Gig) and only 768 DDR2 mem. every one i have talked to has a majior lag in south qeynos and some times in north qeynos. i personly think it is the massive amount of people in the zone and all the rendering the comp has to do.




just my 2cp
#14 Nov 29 2004 at 1:54 PM Rating: Decent
23 posts
Sorry, but the FX line of cards ARE supported; it's the MX line that isn't.
#15 Nov 29 2004 at 2:03 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Sorry, but the FX line of cards ARE supported; it's the MX line that isn't.


Indeed. I had to part with my five-month-old MX that I bought to play FFXI. Some lucky friend is getting a free fairly respectable vidcard...
#16 Nov 29 2004 at 2:15 PM Rating: Good
It'd be one thing if they were as inexpensive. But getting a 256mb Vid Card is still a little on the steep side right now, and my 128mb just isn't cutting it. I'm going to step up my Virtual Memory and doublecheck my AGP settings when I get home today, but I have a feeling I'd just be better off with a completely new setup

Smiley: banghead
#17 Nov 29 2004 at 2:22 PM Rating: Decent
Aye. It's getting harder and harder to rationalize my spending several hundred dollars on one single game...
#18 Nov 29 2004 at 2:34 PM Rating: Decent
**
511 posts
Try following the graphics link posted above. I run an Athlon xp 2800+ and a geforce fx 5600ultra, it runs great. It used to be just like you describe yours though, and this is what helped.

First I followed the graphics link posted above. That helped some but not as much as I wanted. I upgraded to 1 gig of ram. That made all the difference. I was able go over the graphics again, following the link above, but start at balanced and adjust up. The one thing I left off that was still bogging down my pc was Shadows and Specular lighting.

Anyway, I can run right through Qeynos without lag and zone in about 15-30 seconds.
#19 Nov 29 2004 at 2:39 PM Rating: Decent
You're trying to run on balanced? I can only run on High Performance settings and my specs are:

2.6 ghz Pentium 4
1 GB RAM
Radeon 9600XT 128 MB
#20 Nov 29 2004 at 2:40 PM Rating: Decent
**
280 posts
You must have a vid card that has pixel shading otherwise you wont get all the cool effects and what have you. On another note there is NO need to buy a $300 vid card. You can get one that will run very nicely for less than $200 please don't unless you are daddy warbucks go out and purchase a 256mb card you wont need it for quite some time. 128mb is great and will perform the task perfectly.

Hope this Helps.

Gooback
Server:Unrest
18Druid/16Scholar
#21 Nov 29 2004 at 2:58 PM Rating: Decent
**
976 posts
Well, I'm running 1 gig memory, 256 mb Raedon card, 2.4 processor (yech, want to upgrade to at least 2.8 soon) and have cable internet. I run at pretty high graphic settings, but I turn some of my other settings off to do so. I want to see my dude's armor looking all speefy, and the shiney on his scales, and I like to see my party members casting. Runs pretty good, my custom setting is about the same as high performance or balanced, I'd say.

I'm not sure why you have to run it at extreme. Try tweeking with the options a little.
#22 Nov 29 2004 at 3:04 PM Rating: Decent
23 posts
Yes, the memory really seems to make the big difference. I am running a 3.0GHz+ processor with 1G RAM and a GeForce FX5500 OC w/ 256MB DDR RAM. With the above tweaks and a few little modifications to it, I can get great results. I am thinking that anyone running a PCI video card, no matter how much memory is on it, is going to have problems as I think this is a major contributor to their lags and freezes. EQ2 seems to have been written for the up-and-coming video cards and this means at least 8x AGP. (I mean, if you've got the AGP slot on your MB, by all means - USE IT!) My son is running with 512 MB of memory and a 128 MB video RAM and it takes him about 1-2 mins to zone; it takes me about 15-25 secs.

Just my $0.02...
#23 Nov 29 2004 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
Ha, lol...I think ya'll misunderstood what I meant by putting the game on the 'extreme' setting. There's two extreme settings, one for Quality (which requires some SERIOUS hardware) and one for performance, which in blunt terms, dumbs down your game to basically a wireframe to play (well not really, but kinda). I'm on the Extreme "Low" setting right now (2 below Balanced) and it makes the game just look plain out Fugly. Poor rendering, no nice textures, animation is sketchy, no Flora, no nuthin! Just my toon standin there (sometimes like a rendered wireframe with no equip) and everyone else around me. It's such a ****-poor setting, and like I said, I already upgraded to a Radeon 9200SE 128mb ATi card from the previous GeForce MX series I had. So basically, I run a decent setup (2.1GHz, 512mb DDR, 128mb Radeon 9200SE Graphics).

Now personally, I kinda agree with SweetZombieJesus in saying that I'm getting rather sick on the idea that I need to upgrade further to make the game run at a balanced setting. Not that I couldn't afford it, but it's the holiday season, and it's making me consider putting the game on the shelf for a while (which I really don't want to do) because I'm basically not enjoying the fact that my gameplay is effected by not being able to tell when spells are cast and whatnot.

I don't mean to gripe about it or really whine...cause this is just want happens when new games come out. But personally, SoE didn't think too much because most of their "Balanced" settings require a pretty high-end machine, that the likes of most normal PC owners do not have. I even considered with my wife last night financing another new PC from Dell just to wipe away the hassle of rebuilding again, but we don't want to spend another $2k on a machine. Just kinda unfair that while it's great that they looked ahead to make the game worthwhile in the future, they really smacked the current PC Price/Worth ratio right in the face.
#24 Nov 29 2004 at 3:32 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,576 posts
Quote:
I am thinking that anyone running a PCI video card, no matter how much memory is on it, is going to have problems as I think this is a major contributor to their lags and freezes.



He's got a PCI Express which is very different from regular PCI. PCI Express is the next generation PCI meant to surpass AGP (although I've yet to see any demonstrable performance increase from reliable benchmark sources).

One very good thing about PCI express is that it's more scalable. You can run multiple cards SLI which should effect performance pretty dramatically (but for a price).


http://www20.graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20040310/index.html

Edited, Mon Nov 29 15:36:58 2004 by subvert
#25 Nov 29 2004 at 3:37 PM Rating: Decent
yes, just like everyone said, its a video card. I bought nvidia 5700 card last new years for $300, you can probably get one today for couple hundred dollars easy (canadian) if not less.

I can run game on performance settings + maximum resolution for character models (have not tried to max particle effects yet) and it works great and looks great. I did add few things to it until I felt that it was working fast and had all the features I wanted (like flora for example). Just take that from down up aproach, set your performance settings to high performance, and start increasing features (start from texture resolutions).

Just keep in mind that interactive features take a lot of proccessing power and only work well on high end video cards (things like interactive water and flora, reflections, weather, glare...etc). They do add to the game, but I do not see myself spending $500 on a video card that can make water to move as I run through it. In a year those video cards will be half price and in couple years you will be able to buy video card that will pull this game on maximum settings for 200-300 dollars anyway.

Bleeding edge technology always cost a load of money.
#26 Nov 29 2004 at 4:51 PM Rating: Decent


I don't remember where I read it but believe it was from one of the developer's of the game. And I kinda quote:

"We, here at Everquest making company, decided to truly push the graphical envelope with this new chapter in EQ. So, with the idea of longevity, have decided to make the game so uber ridiculous in terms of graphics, that current commercial technology cannot run it at it's full, intended settings and potential. This way, 6 months - 1 year down the road, when the latest and greatest video cards, processor's, etc. come out, all of our loyal customers will then, and only then, be able to enjoy this graphical display cranked up to max. "

Again, don't remember where I read it but know I read it. So tecnically, according to that guy, noone can play the game at full settings smoothly right now cause what's needed to accomplish that hasn't even hit market yet. Anyone that says otherwise is probably bsing or stretching the truth. So I'd wait a few months (since it sounds like ur a hardcore, aka, dedicated type of guy,) then get some goodies, so that you can maximize this game's efficiency.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 36 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (36)