ok, im a kerra, on the Good side. Course i chose good because in EQ1, i was an evil ogre, with no other alts. i am a fighter, and now i need to decide which class to go. I'm interested in being a berserker, because in EQ1 i was a 65 shaman (priest class), in Final Fantasy XII a thief (scout class), and now i just want to be a pure melee guy. Berserker appealed to me. They wear heavy gear which ive never had being a shaman (eq1) and thief (ffxi), and that berserkers do pure melee damage. I don't feel like being a mage type yet until later. But in any case, I'm ranting.....
Here's my dilemma:
I wanted to be a berserker, assuming they were just DPS (damaging) class, but I was told they were "just tanks who do more damage". Guardians are better tanks. I don't want to be a tank, if so, I'd be a guardian. Then I thought about monk (though i really wanted to use weapons and wear heavy gear) and I wanted to know if they do more damage than berserkers. If that's the case, what's the point of a berserker.
So....what are the advantages of being a berserker? Am i just a crappy "in between" class? Are people always going to invite another class over me because I'm not the greatest tank nor the greatest DPS? Remember I'm on good side, so i can't be bruiser, only monk.
Next question, what are the advantages of a paladin? Are they just like in EQ1? Are they tanks? Are they dps with heals? I'm lost!!!! :(
Please answer both questions if u can. If a berserker is a crappy in between class, I don't want to be it. Though if they are efficient players that groups would love to have, then im for it.