What you rec'd on Saturday, November 13 was notification that UPS was informed that there was a pickup available, not the actual pickup notification. I'm sure that you saw this when you clicked on the link in an attempt to track your package on Saturday.
The notification on the 13th was distributed by SOE to temporarily appease those of us who got the royal shaft on the PRE-ORDER deal. This is a well-worn shipping/receiving tactic. You let the carrier know that the package is 'available' for pick up so that you can then notify the customer of shipment when in actual fact the shipment is still sitting on the dock.
Here's my example...
= = = = = S N I P from SOE= = = = =
<my name>,
We are happy to inform you that your recent order at the Station.com Store has
shipped.
You can track the progress of your shipment at the following URL:
http://wwwapps.ups.com/etracking/tracking.cgi?TypeOfInquiryNumber=T&InquiryNumber= <my tracking number>
Please note that it may take UPS some time to update their web site with your
tracking information.
Shipping Details:
Order Number: <my order number>
Shipping Method: UPS.2DA
Ship Date: November 13, 2004
Tracking Number: <my tracking number, again>
Thank you,
Sony Online Entertainment Inc.
www.station.sony.com
= = = = = END S N I P = = = = =
Now, as most individuals already know, UPS does not perform these pickups on Saturdays and hence the actual ship date was in fact today, Monday, November 15 as evidenced by my 'actual' UPS tracking information below.
= = = = = S N I P from UPS= = = = =
Nov 15, 2004 OMAHA, NE, US DEPARTURE SCAN
10:00 P.M.
6:33 P.M. OMAHA, NE, US ORIGIN SCAN
1:20 P.M. US BILLING INFORMATION RECEIVED
= = = = = END S N I P = = = = =
Now, personally I would much rather have had them be honest with us and send us 'REAL' information regarding the true nature of the problem and provide us with accurate information instead of insulting our intelligence further by continuing this farce but, as it's a simple case of a company trying, unsuccessfully, to save face after a glaringly embarrassing mistake that drastically inconvenienced a large number of paying clients I can't really blame them for trying. It's an unfortunately common practice and one that was not at all unexpected, at least by me.
I've come to expect this level of corruption and incompetence from organizations such at this and am therefore not surprised in the least when issues such as this arise. The day that a company actually steps up and addresses this kind of problem in an honest and just fashion I will truly be surprised. Until then, I'll continue to 'expect' the worst and be seldom disappointed.
Faerless
Edited, Tue Nov 16 03:02:43 2004 by Faerless
Edited, Tue Nov 16 03:03:14 2004 by Faerless