lass5 wrote:
The apologists know deep down Yoshi is taking a dump on the FF Dark Knight name, just like he did with XIV Bard (not a Bard), summoner, scholar, etc.
Dark Knight in name only.
And what exactly do you define "Dark Knight" as being, then, that you disagree with XIV's proposed version of it?
Historically in Final Fantasy games, the Dark Knight was this guy who wore dark-colored armor, usually used large 2H weapons, and had some dark magic (though not always; See FF4).
In FFXI, the Dark Knight had some Elemental spells nobody used, some Dark Magic (Bio/Drain/Aspir) and some Absorb spells.
Not seeing where you're saying that Yoshi is "taking a dump on the FF Dark Knight Name". Just because the Dark Knight is going to be capable of tanking doesn't mean that they're going to completely re-invent the idea of the Dark Knight class/job/whatever.
As for Bard... what exactly IS a Bard in FF History? A Bard is someone who uses songs. Older FFs had them using harps as a hilariously weak offensive weapon. In FFXIV, the Bard does indeed have songs, but also uses bows. So basically... all they did was add Bows to the bards and made the songs a bit less used. The game's design did not allow for a pure-support character, so there was no need to put a spammy pure support class in the game, so they had to have Something else other than just Songs, so they combined Ranger and Bard into one class (which was a good idea IMO).
So tell me, Lass5... are you complaining because Dark Knight and Bard are "in name only", or are you merely just complaining because you don't like that Dark Knight appears to borrow ideas from WoW's Death Knight? Be real with us here; what you said doesn't really fly.