Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

@ boxing on raidsFollow

#1 May 30 2007 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
I see from the occasional post that there are still quite a few raiding players reading this forum, I'm interested in the general view on 2 boxers being allowed to raid and win loot.

Over the years I've seen some pretty heated argument over this matter and Terror Australis is currently reviewing its policy so it would be interesting to see what the general view is these days.

In the past we had allowed a 2nd box that met all the raid requirements earn dkp and bid the same as a main member. But there was a largish section of the guild that did not like this, so we closed off entry to new 2nd boxes for a long period. This what we are currently reviewing as some would like to re-open entry to 2nd boxes.
#2 May 30 2007 at 11:02 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
***
1,074 posts
In my opinion, many raids would not be possible without boxed characters. There are simply not enough people playing to fill all necessary roles these days.

That said, it is an argument very much in the grey area. Should a box have equal rights if it is an absolutley necessary part of the raid?

Example: A Cleric assigned to the main tank.

What about a box that is there as a bonus, not as a necessity?

Example: A Beastlord thrown in for some added DPS.

Very, very grey.
____________________________
After 16 years, I'm not listing every friggin character.
#3 May 31 2007 at 2:05 AM Rating: Decent
**
647 posts
IMO any toon that participates in a raid has earned the right to loot, whether by DKP or /ran (Except in rare instances such as epic fights where the whole point of the raid is to win Item_X for a specific toon). I don't care that the player behind the toon is also playing three other toons, if (s)he can play them all well at the same time.

I have a hard enough time playing one toon sort of not-catastrophically-poorly, so I don't understand how boxers manage, but if they pull their weight, they earned the DPK in my book.

Which obviously also means that one DKP = one DKP.

I have yet to understand the distinction between Main and Alts in relation to DKP. In the raiding guilds I've been in, a huge deal is made about mains being allowed to bid before alts. Well, if I played any of my characters (alt-flagged or not) in a raid and wasn't allowed to bid the DKP I have earned, I'd quit the guild right then and there.

So when a boxed character has raided and earned DKP, that toon should be allowed to bid on equal footing with everyone else.

One for all and all for one.
#4 May 31 2007 at 4:48 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
56 posts
I totally agree with Whitman!

I think the question should be, Can the Boxing player do their job? If not then why are they boxing? If they play the character with skill then what is the diffrence?

How about the player who boxes but never says it. If they are good at it who whould know?

____________________________
Gaflack

Gaflack 70 Druid 222AA Sleeper
Bredon 70 Cleric 120AA
Zimrathon 70 War 200AA
Minastan 70 Enchanter 123AA
Mesalar 58 Mage 5AA

Retired Fennin and FV: Gaflack 70 Druid, Ministan 70 Enchanter, Minastan 66 Enchanter, Zimrathon 60 Enchanter, Zimrathon 60 War, Bredon 62 Cleric, Breredon 62 CLeric, Mesular 62 Mage, Mesalar 57 Mage
#5 May 31 2007 at 5:17 AM Rating: Default
Well, that doesn't seem quite fair. Some people may have mains that they love but aren't able to attend as many raids, resulting in less DKP than the alt's that have accumulated more then the mains. It's an overall consensus that a main is more important than an alt. In my guild regardless of how important that alt be, whether it be the main tank or the healer healing the tank, the alts ALWAYS bid if no mains want it. Even if it is just one main, no alts bid. That's my view point and im not putting anyone else's down, but feel free to criticize my views in a nice manner
#6 May 31 2007 at 5:44 AM Rating: Decent
**
297 posts
Just be clear in the guild rules. Changing in mid-stream will result in problems for some of the members no matter which way you go.

In my old raiding guild (at the time #3 on the server during PoP, GoD, OoW), we recruited based on someone's main character, and we planned raids based on the main characters. Points were only awarded to the main character.

Alts were never allowed on main raids (mandatory attendence for main characters). Now, if some loot was rotting, someone could bid for their alt if they can get their alt there fast enough to loot it. You used your main characters points for the item.

Occasionally, we'd have to fire up a healing bot or buff bot to have the raid. The guild leadership did not award any special points or favors to these bots. Their feeling was that if the bot didn't play, we wouldn't have a raid, no one would get points or loot. Definitely a hard line approach, but everyone knew the rule.
#7 May 31 2007 at 6:04 AM Rating: Decent
27 posts
The way my old raiding guild did it was you had to tell the RL before the raid began what toon you would be "rolling" for that night. If you did not say anything then you could only be in on loot for your main.
#8 May 31 2007 at 7:13 AM Rating: Decent
**
902 posts
I agree with Piz...the guild just needs to state what the rules are clearly and go with it. Our guild is smaller, so we allow boxing and all who are there get loot rights. But I can also see where a guild might not see this is fair.

Just state it in advance, then have fun.
#9 May 31 2007 at 7:23 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
The Honorable yenwangweh wrote:
I agree with Piz...the guild just needs to state what the rules are clearly and go with it.


QFT,

I suppose you also need to consider whether the guild needs the boxed toons for their progression plans. If they do, they also need to have those boxed toons geared up.

Certainly some boxed toons are going to contribute more or less than other boxed toons, but similarly some main, single boxed toons may be contributing significantly less than they should or could as well.

The problem I've found with boxing on raids is trying to keep all the 2-boxers in the same group. It can be an organizational nightmare. Smiley: eek

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#10 May 31 2007 at 7:37 AM Rating: Decent
**
902 posts
Totally off subject, but what does QFT mean. ( damn, feeling old and out fo touch.)Smiley: grin
#11 May 31 2007 at 7:51 AM Rating: Decent
*
68 posts
QFT = Quoted For Truth I believe.
#12 May 31 2007 at 7:53 AM Rating: Decent
**
902 posts
Ahh...thank you. So I dont need to be offended. Smiley: sly
#13 May 31 2007 at 9:54 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
318 posts
Our guild allows you to have a main and a box on any raid. Boxes will be dropped in favor of mains if we run into the max number of people and mains get chosen over boxes for piggie spots.

DKP = a boxed toon earns the same dkp as the main but has to pay 1.5 the price for an item. We don't have a bidding system, each item is worth a set amount of points no matter if it's the first drop or the 20th.

So Notched Blade of Bloodletting will cost a main 100 dkp but a box would pay 150 dkp.

We still end up with boxes winning loot over mains but these are generally people with very good attendance.
#14 May 31 2007 at 10:02 AM Rating: Good
**
297 posts
In my guild, boxes are allowed on raids only if the player has proven to be able to box efficiently in the past. Many don't bring their alts along unless we desperately need their particular abilities (ex: we had no crowd control at our last raid, so an offtank warrior brought along her boxed shaman). Alts are immediately dropped from the raid/group in favour of someone who wishes to attend with their main.

We don't have too many boxed alts on raids anymore, so I don't remember the last time anyone spent DKP on an alt. Alts are allowed to roll on loot in regular groups, and I believe are allowed to bid with DKP on raids.

The system we have works, though the rules about alts are clearly stated in the guild charter, which helps quite a bit.
#15 May 31 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
318 posts
The above post points out why you need to define Atl and Box.

In my guild you can only have 1 main and 1 box for raids which must be posted on the guild website, any other toon you play is an alt.

So in general a box can be online at the same time as your main while an alt can't.

No alts are allowed to loot anything from a raid zone. The guild leaders even destroy 1.5/2.0 chest loots if no one in the raid wants it. IMO, this is a good thing as greedy people will bring alts to epic raids for the drops while not contributing to the raid.
#16 May 31 2007 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
hardolmer wrote:
Well, that doesn't seem quite fair. Some people may have mains that they love but aren't able to attend as many raids, resulting in less DKP than the alt's that have accumulated more then the mains. It's an overall consensus that a main is more important than an alt.


Quite a few members have expressed this same view.

Terror Australis has always had a basic principle of wanting to be as inclusive as possible. One of our primary purposes as a guild is to provide a home for people who want to play in our time zone. So the idea of an alt disadvantaging someone who can't attend every raid really goes against what we are about.

(We are Australia/New Zealand based so time zone is around GMT +10, not the time slot for the highest gaming populationg going around Smiley: rolleyes we do have number of US military personel based in the Pacific/Asia region though.)
#17 May 31 2007 at 6:36 PM Rating: Decent
*
73 posts
I disagree with that. No 1.5 or 2.0 loot should EVER get destroyed even if it gets given to a stranger. It's just wrong to let such a thing get destroyed. Some people that may not ever have time go get in a raiding guild, might be able to use it and never get the chance to get it. I'm on Maelin server and have a 70 ranger, and someone I don't know sent me a tell and asked me if I wanted a 1.5 chest loot for a ranger. Of coarse I said yes. I think that kind of kindness is awesome and if I ever get the chance, I will do the same for someone else:)
#18 May 31 2007 at 8:03 PM Rating: Decent
**
449 posts
Interesting topic, and some interesting opinions. My opinion is very skewed towards boxing, but I'll give it anyway. I'm very good at running a tank with 2 priests to heal, I know when to lifetap and when every heal is going to land. If I were to raid I would want to bring my boxes because I heal me better than anyone else does. I would also expect dkp for it since I'm filling a tank and 2 healer roles regardless of only being one person. I don't think a guild should allow a boxer to share his dkp between his boxes though, that would seriously ***** everyone else over. I'm not much of a raider, my guild consists of 2 other couples that box with their spouses. Sometimes we get a few groups together to take down minor things like ragewind, colosses in skylance, etc. Summary: if the toon is played well and doing their job they should earn just as many dkp for being there as anyone else.
#19 Jun 02 2007 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
The idea of a RL deliberately destroying loot is to me, one of the most offensive things I've ever heard of in the game. If there is someone who can use it, it should be used. Even if given to complete strangers.

As far as boxed toons go, if they can be played well, they should get full credit. I'm sorry for those who have mains that can't make it as often as others who would be boxing, but look at it this way. If you have someone who boxes effectively, that's TWO well-equipped, dependable characters for raids, helping to form a larger, solid core group for the guild raids. Or you can have one well-equipped/semi-equppied box and the semi-equipped, less attending main. Give the guild an overall stronger group of characters who can be depended on for higher attendance. Everyone will benefit from that. Maybe make an attendance rule for those who want to box and get full DKP. Somethin like player must attend X percentage of raids in order to qualify box for full DKP.

Edited, Jun 2nd 2007 5:24pm by winchester

Edited, Jun 2nd 2007 5:26pm by winchester
#20 Jun 02 2007 at 7:39 PM Rating: Good
Reyla wrote:
In my opinion, many raids would not be possible without boxed characters. There are simply not enough people playing to fill all necessary roles these days.


Actually the problem is not so much the numbers, but the variability of the numbers.

During the course of a year we go through periods where we have full raids and drop boxes to make room for all the mains. But then we go through periods where we need boxes just to hit Mystwalker or Narseekin. Drives the raid leaders frantic as you could imagine.

We have been trying a variation of one of the suggestions made here, where we have invited people who regularly play a second box in groups, to volanteer them as raid helpers. We did this via a list on the guild forum, this meant that the raid leader had a list of alts (helpers) that they could call on to fill gaps.

The helpers were not expected to perform to the level of a fully experienced second box, but to be able to help out, buffing, rezzing back up healing etc.

This seems to have worked well. But now it seems unfair to those people who put in the effort of keeping their alt geared up and raid worthy, but who earn no DKP and can't loot. Actually we do use the "open to all" method of bidding when no main or officail 2nd box has bid and the helpers can bid but have to use the main's DKP.

A compromise of sorts, but this depletes the mains DKP and leaves them with less chance to compete for the "good" loot. /sigh.

P.S. But having said that, yes we certainly would like about 10 more committed raiders.

Edited, Jun 3rd 2007 3:40am by Iluien

Edited, Jun 3rd 2007 3:42am by Iluien
#21 Jun 03 2007 at 2:44 AM Rating: Good
**
647 posts
Quote:
hardolmer wrote:
Well, that doesn't seem quite fair. Some people may have mains that they love but aren't able to attend as many raids, resulting in less DKP than the alt's that have accumulated more then the mains. It's an overall consensus that a main is more important than an alt.


BS. 100% BS. Just because I 'love' my character, do I have more right to loot than people who put in more time and effort than I do?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 132 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (132)