Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Any Point to Come Back?Follow

#1 Jan 03 2007 at 6:45 PM Rating: Good
**
495 posts
So I've been having a craving to play EQ again and was wondering how the population count was doing (preferrably on the Firiona Vie server since that's where I'd be going back to.)

Are there still quite a few people playing? Enough to have someone to team up with in the early levels?

I'm thinking about playing beastlord though I think my last character I had was a 51 or something Necromancer. I might just continue the necro. Not really sure.

Anyhoo, is anyone else also planning on starting up again soon? I've tried convincing my friends to at least try out the game but they won't leave FFXI :P

Thanks!
#2 Jan 03 2007 at 8:04 PM Rating: Excellent
fv is COMPLETELY dead, most other servers are ok.
#3 Jan 04 2007 at 12:38 AM Rating: Good
Groogle wrote:
fv is COMPLETELY dead, most other servers are ok.


Wich to a necro would be pretty nice : )

I wouldnt say completely dead but i would say its less populated than most servers where before the mergers definately hurts grouping in the pre 70 levels.
#4 Jan 04 2007 at 4:11 AM Rating: Good
***
1,625 posts
Last night I deleted all my toons except my main. Then I started a level 1 non-twinked Necro with the understanding that grouping will be limited. As long as you are okay with that then you should be good.
#5 Jan 04 2007 at 5:51 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
On a similar subject. Is there even any low lvl population on any of the servers? I came back and I'm playing on Maelin and at lvl 17, I still haven't found more than maybe one person the entire time even close to my level who wasn't a bazaar mule.


It's wierd actually doing quests this time through instead of just grouping with people and killing things.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#6 Jan 04 2007 at 6:48 AM Rating: Decent
**
286 posts
I have been bouncing between Druzzil Ro (Xev) and Test, and I don't have a ton of problems getting groups. Honestly, I usually solo most of the time, but things are not that bad IMHO. Now if you were looking for the days when you could be in POK for about 5 minutes before a group formed, then forget it. I have found that the best way to get a group is to star one yourself, and use every resource at your disposal to accomplish it in the shortest time possible. While few folks seem to be using the LFG tool, those I get are usually seasoned vets playing alts, so there is little worry about them being clueless. And don't be timid about OOC in both POK (or the mustering zone of your choice), as well as the zone you intend on grouping in.

I think you should not have too much trouble getting groups on the whole, so welcome back!
#7 Jan 04 2007 at 11:38 AM Rating: Default
"Any Point to Come Back?" No.

#8 Jan 04 2007 at 2:12 PM Rating: Good
I just recently came back myself and I'm having a great time. I play all sorts of classes at pretty much all levels and haven't had too much trouble finding groups on Quellious. Those times I can't find groups, I either PL myself with my second account or solo. Soloing has become extremely easy with all the cheap armor and weapons with great stats. There are around 40 active people in my guild, almost all of whom have stated that they'll be playing until the servers are shut down.
#9 Jan 04 2007 at 4:07 PM Rating: Excellent
The truth of the matter is that EQ is not, and never will be the game you may remember. I've come back twice in the last year, and each time I've scouted servers to get an idea of low-end populations. This last time I went back home to Stromm, one of the more populated servers, and discovered that there are VERY few group opportunities for players under level 40, approximately. Everytime I logged my warrior in, I put up the /lfg flag, and went to solo while I waited. Luckily, I was twinked and could afford to buy heal and skin spike potions, because on average, I would see 1, maybe 2 people in my range /lfg. I was in a total of 3 groups between level 1 and level 41. I would aslo actively try to recruit my own group, but very rarely found more than 1 person in my range who would agree to group.

It used to be that certain low-end zones consistently supported a player base which would facillitate a fairly dependable group opportunity, but even zones like the dreaded Paludal rarely have anyone in them. On a brighter side, there are a lot of great quests in the new TSS zone, Crescent Reach (and the adjacent zone, Blightfire Moors) but many of those are not soloable. Group opportunities in these new zones are also few and far between.

I don't want to completely discourage you from coming back, but I think you should know that if you aren't able to solo the low levels, you're in for a very frustrating experience.
#10 Jan 04 2007 at 4:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
I've been playing off and on for a couple weeks now. I'm finding there are a lot of things I need to unlearn and relearn. but still fun
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#11 Jan 04 2007 at 9:44 PM Rating: Decent
I agree with Elvo! and yes FV is dead but then again so are all the other servers unless your a high end toon.
#12 Jan 04 2007 at 9:57 PM Rating: Decent
I have a 51 rogue on FV that I play every once in a while. He is geared much better than my other characters around that level on other servers, but soloing is still unrewarding. Last night I logged in and found a hotzone group within 10 minutes which lasted for several hours. After it broke up, again within 10 minutes I had a group. They were both pickup groups that did as well as I could have expected considering I had never met any of them.

Also the people on FV are on average way ahead of the curve gearwise so you can do more with less. But most are players are 70+. If you are willing to solo a bit on the way you could catch up.
#13 Jan 05 2007 at 11:13 AM Rating: Decent
Population on my server seems ok. I have trouble getting the camp I want so there must be too many people!
#14 Jan 05 2007 at 12:21 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,128 posts
With the ease of getting cheap twink gear in baz, most, if not all, classes can solo easily to level 30 or higher. Even so last night on my server, Xegony, there was a group of 4 toons looking for more in Paludal Caverans level 17-22. In the mid range level the population is growing and you see more 40-60s /lfg than pre TSS thanks to the new easier AA exp at lower levels.
#15 Jan 14 2007 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
The tunare server is greta for all levels. Pretty much the perfect amount of people on it IMHO
#16 Feb 05 2007 at 5:43 PM Rating: Decent
Ok i have got the craving back for everquest :)
Like many others i guess i want to know how my old server is , XEGONY
are there still a good range of toons playing.
Just befor i left i was getting into DoD but groups were becoming hard to find , so i went to my lill toons ( o how i love my twinks ).
Btw my main was a 70 ranger , nothing uber but was great in groups.
So if any 1 had a toon on xegony plz post back just to say yay or nay to comming back :)

Sukkena Wolfmist 70 Ranja
#17 Feb 11 2007 at 10:20 AM Rating: Decent
i also have been thinking about coming back, probably to my old server, bertoxxulous. does anyone on here play on bertoxxulous, and if so, how is the population and such doing
#18 Feb 11 2007 at 4:15 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
So if any 1 had a toon on xegony plz post back just to say yay or nay to comming back :)


nay for seriously LOL!
#19 Feb 11 2007 at 4:33 PM Rating: Decent
Come over to the dark side... Roll a character in World of Warcraft, hehe. 8 Million players spread over hundreds of servers... All classes can get groups, all classes can solo their way to 70.


FYI I played Everquest for four years and for the last two, I was really frustrated with the game -- most content required groups, most groups only wanted the holy trinity (tank + cleric + crowd control) so some classes were not wanted in groups ; a new expansion every 4-6 months which further devalued older zones and non-desirable characters... the list goes on and on and on...

I've been playing WoW for 2+ years and have never experienced any of the frustration I did in EQ. Blizzard got it right (they did the unthinkable -- they waited 2 years to release their first expansion (the Burning Crusade), and even resisted the temptation to push out a buggy, unfinished expansion during the holiday season (cough EQ cough).

#20 Feb 12 2007 at 2:03 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
267 posts
Bertox(really TP with a new name) is a good server, i am not sure what level you are but you should be able to get a group.

There are many guilds where you may be able to find people of your level.
#21 Feb 12 2007 at 2:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
WillySWG wrote:
Come over to the dark side... Roll a character in World of Warcraft, hehe.
Ironicly, I played WoW and got kind of bored with it. The gameplay itself is much more shallow compared to EQ. Different strokes and all that.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 Feb 12 2007 at 3:32 PM Rating: Decent
*
222 posts
WillySWG wrote:
I played Everquest... I was really frustrated -- most content required groups, a new expansion every 4-6 months, devalued older zones... the list goes on and on and on...


100% /agree

The ONLY way I could ever get into EQ again is when I get 7 computers. (Note: I said when!) You can't do anything solo, and what you can do in a group takes too long. 64 man raids? No thanks, not worth the reward for the time involved.

Jophiel wrote:
I played WoW and got kind of bored with it. The gameplay itself is much more shallow compared to EQ.


100% /agree

Aye, another good point. But my spiked shoulders look cool with my spiked helmet! You won't see any Pink Ogre wearing those! Plus, you can get upgrades in an hour or two of playing.

Komzur wrote:
Why did you quit in the first place?
#23 Feb 12 2007 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,156 posts
Komzur the Malevolent wrote:
The ONLY way I could ever get into EQ again is when I get 7 computers. (Note: I said when!) You can't do anything solo, and what you can do in a group takes too long. 64 man raids? No thanks, not worth the reward for the time involved.

I was an almost self sufficent group with 5. I was missing a solid Tank. And being so dependent on others to fill the role was very frustrating. So the idea of being my own group beholdent to none is a plus to me as well.

Conversely.. I never really got could play more than 3 at a time well enough to satistify me. Of course, if I was playing all 6.. I guess I might have different levels of acceptable. My standard was to play DPS/healer/CC-slower well enough that the other three real people had no reason to complain.

Jophiel wrote:
I played WoW and got kind of bored with it. The gameplay itself is much more shallow compared to EQ.


Sometimes I get struck with the sameness.. but.. camp the Shining Metallic Robes for a day (rare drop of a rare spawn) and WoW suddenly seems a lot more active to me. At least you are moving. Knocking out one quest and moving on.

I also did a almost two month all PvP jaunt. I "knew" that I hated PvP.. and it turns out it's a lot of fun playing against mobs that fight back well. When I get bored again (when all my prime characteras are 70 for example).. might return to PvP.

And, the very easy/casual nature of WoW is a plus for me. A 40 year old in a guild of 30/40/50 year olds.. my play time (high for my guild) is low for some. Only 3-5 hours a day. *giggle* True story:

Mid Novemember.. Felicite hit Rank 10 and retired from PvP. I played all my alts on rest, and started a few Horde alts. And I started playing Celadora my 30 Driud that I made to play with my kids. By mid December she was my Guild's new 5 man tank and tanking Scholomance and Stratholme. In EQ (or Vanguard) I do not believe I could start a project alt and be plugging it into our guild A team in a month. Try 6 months plus.

I miss the "deeper" play of EQ. BUT. So many of my last nights (months worth) in EQ were spent camped in a single spot pulling mobs to the group. For hours. Now, the slowing killing rate made it easier to chat. Yes. But I am not sure why sitting in one place for hours hoping for the right mob spawn and finally drop my goody is more mentally engaging than ranging over a zone or 3 doing a dozen or two decrete (but awfully similar) quests for the same amount of time.
#24 Feb 12 2007 at 5:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Felicite wrote:
Sometimes I get struck with the sameness.. but.. camp the Shining Metallic Robes for a day (rare drop of a rare spawn) and WoW suddenly seems a lot more active to me. At least you are moving. Knocking out one quest and moving on.
I'm speaking more of the dearth of abilities and stuff. One thing I've noticed is that Everquest has a ton of utility style spells that other games don't even come close to. But, then again, I have (had) a bard main in EQ so I've yet to find the MMORPG which can emulate that experience and flexibility Smiley: grin

I'm not hating on WoW. It's a good game. It has a friggin' massive playerbase. It just didn't grab me the same way.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Feb 12 2007 at 7:25 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,156 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I'm speaking more of the dearth of abilities and stuff. One thing I've noticed is that Everquest has a ton of utility style spells that other games don't even come close to. But, then again, I have (had) a bard main in EQ so I've yet to find the MMORPG which can emulate that experience and flexibility Smiley: grin

That's a fair cop.

But, as a max level (of the day) Necromancer, Cleric and Enchanter with hundreds of AAs (I was actually within a few weeks of max useful AA with Felicite) I never used any of it. You can only have 9 spells up at a time.. and most of the "fun" spells have little utility at high end.

Yeah, I miss playing a real Enchanter. Being able to lock down 4-6 mobs.

I'm not hating on EQ either.

Just SOE.. and that's between them and me.
#26 Feb 12 2007 at 11:59 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,906 posts
KaralliothWolfmist wrote:
So if any 1 had a toon on xegony plz post back just to say yay or nay to comming back :)

Yay to coming back. CU on Xegony.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 101 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (101)