Quote:
I think it's time for a Battle-Mage class:
Hybrid Magician+Melee
Wears silk or chain armor. If silk the class would be on the rogue damage mitigation table, if chain the class would be on the INT caster mitigation table (although this would be an INT based caster and I'm not sure if there's much chain armor with INT on it).
I'm not quite following you here. Did you get it backwards by any chance?
Quote:
Double attack ability but not dual wield.
Hmmm. Depends on what the role would be, DPS vs tanking.
Pally (tank) - double attack, no DW
SK (tank) - double attack, no DW
ranger (DPS with some utility) - double attack and DW
bard (some DPS, mostly utility) - DW but no double attack (until level 71 or with AAs)
BL (DPS and some utility) - DW but no double attack (until level 71 or with AAs)
Quote:
Pet class, but pet should not be top-end, more along the lines of shaman pet strength.
Yeah, the pet would need to be around 15-20 levels behind the mage pet, assuming it follows the pet template of the current pet hybrids.
Quote:
Summons pet gear, either new items less powerful than magician or the same stuff but getting the spells at later level.
Again, probably mostly same stuff at later levels, following the current hybrid templates. There would of course be some unique stuff added though (a la rangers nukes, SKs hate spells and dd spears, pally's brells, etc).
Quote:
Summons player usable melee weapons and gear unique to the class, with combat modifiers.
Sounds cool, but would probably be mostly wasted spells. They would make the effects of the items so low that most people wouldn't even consider using it, especially mages can already make the items with spell foci.
Quote:
Nuke capabilites along the lines of Enchanter nukes, or a little less.
That sounds about right. They wouldn't make them anywhere near as good as it's parent class, but chanter nukes would probably be considered reasonable. It would give chanters something else to complain about at least.
I'm personally not excited about any new classes. I've seen different class ideas batted around for years now and I can't really say any have piqued my interest, yet at least. One big problem is the amount of work that's required to get the new class "up to speed". We saw the same thing to an extent with BLs and to a greater extent with berserkers. They would make the class, give it it's spells and stuff, add itemization for some lower level stuff, but then the mid level would have either NOTHING they can use or they would just smack the class as useable on current items without any thought into it's balance and/or relevance. So you'd have people complaining about only having chain armor that has WIS on it (like you pointed out above) even though they're an INT class and about the lack of class specific items and stuff. They would have to try and add class specific items in every raid zone to date (or ignore it and say too bad, so sad).