Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

NBG...Follow

#1 Jul 11 2005 at 4:16 AM Rating: Decent
Im the kind of guy who never rolls on something I dont need. (Only exception is if noone else in groups needs either ofcourse).

Last night a HP aug dropped in a group I was in and they said it was NBG. Im a wizard so according to the tank I shouldnt be allowed to roll cause casters dont need HP.. That was about the most stupid thing I ever heared.. I rolled and won the aug and then got hatetells from the tank. I wouldnt have rolled on a AC aug but HP is something everyone needs especially in a raiding envirement when casters keeps dying to AE's. He just couldnt understand that I needed HP as a caster.
He put me on ignore and I left the group...

Do you think I did wrong as to roll on a HP aug as a caster?

Sorry for crappy english, im swedish.. :x
#2 Jul 11 2005 at 5:24 AM Rating: Decent
No, cant see anything wrong. Hell, im a necro, I would roll on HP as well as AC aug!
#3 Jul 11 2005 at 5:35 AM Rating: Decent
heh.. well I wouldnt bother with AC aug tbh, sure AC is good but other augs I rather have then AC :)
I wouldnt hold it against any caster rolling on AC though, but still I wouldnt do it.
#4 Jul 11 2005 at 5:51 AM Rating: Decent
*
197 posts
It sounds like this guy has never played a caster or was trying to intimidate you into not rolling on the aug so he would have a better chance of getting it.

I would say everyone needs hp and that all classes should roll on that. The hate agro created when a caster hits a mob with a spell can cause a casters death. Any way to keep the casters alive long enough to get agro off them is ok in my book.

Wear your aug with pride. You earned it. And remember not to group with that guy again.
#5 Jul 11 2005 at 5:59 AM Rating: Decent
velveetie wrote:
It sounds like this guy has never played a caster or was trying to intimidate you into not rolling on the aug so he would have a better chance of getting it.

I would say everyone needs hp and that all classes should roll on that. The hate agro created when a caster hits a mob with a spell can cause a casters death. Any way to keep the casters alive long enough to get agro off them is ok in my book.

Wear your aug with pride. You earned it. And remember not to group with that guy again.


Just what I thought.. I never regretted rolling on it but the reason for me to post this question here was that according to him everyone in pok would have said NBG on HP aug means tank only if I had asked in /ooc.
I knew what my guild thinks but since they are a raiding guild mby some casuall players would disagree.. (That was what he said they would).. thats the reason for posting here.. To get replies from some more casual players.

Seems all agree that his statement was stupid.. :)
Hope he reads this, removes his /ignore bumbi and then appologize so I can reply "to late! /ignore" ;P
Nah.. I dont keep people on ignore unless they are really stupid.. wouldnt group with him again though..
#6 Jul 11 2005 at 7:04 AM Rating: Decent
*
53 posts
Speaking as a warrior, a HP aug is top list when it comes to augs. Rolling in a group however, an aug like that should be FFA. Just because someone pulls the NBG card out, does not mean they should get their way. Each group member can use an aug like that. If an aug drops that has HP and mana, well, I'm rolling on it too. Only aug I won't roll on is a mana-only one. If it will help me and I can use it, danged if I ain't rolling. You did the right thing and don't worry about one sore loser. If that aug dropped in your camp once it will drop again. Make a hotkey: /em hands %t his pacifier. (J/K)
#7 Jul 11 2005 at 7:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You saw a need for it and you rolled on it. The warrior was just bent out of shape because he probably assumed it would just go to him.

Years ago, people made NBG kind of the standard for pick-up groups and, if you argued, you were some selfish *******, etc etc. Since then, I think most people have realized that NBG in pick-up groups simply doesn't work much of the time due to dishonesty, what drops at different camps and the simple fact that it means my well-equipped character is dressing your shabbily dressed character since you'll always "need" more. In pick-ups, I adopt the theory that we all put forth equal work in being there (within our roles) and so we all have an equal right to whatever drops. In guild/friend groups, I usually pass on anything that might upgrade someone else just out of principle.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Jul 11 2005 at 8:52 AM Rating: Decent
I remember when everything was NBG. Now its just not the way things work. Of course, if theres a cleric in a group and a cleric item drops... He'll have first dibs at the item. And just because another member of the group has a cleric alt, doesn't mean he gets dibs. But if that cleric passes on the item, its fair game to /random 100. Thats the way I've experienced in my 5 years of playing.

Of course, all of this is nill if you are talking guild loot. Those rules are set by the raid leader. All of my comments are solely for pickup group experiences.
#9 Jul 11 2005 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
sjames wrote:
I remember when everything was NBG. Now its just not the way things work. Of course, if theres a cleric in a group and a cleric item drops... He'll have first dibs at the item. And just because another member of the group has a cleric alt, doesn't mean he gets dibs. But if that cleric passes on the item, its fair game to /random 100. Thats the way I've experienced in my 5 years of playing.

Of course, all of this is nill if you are talking guild loot. Those rules are set by the raid leader. All of my comments are solely for pickup group experiences.


Exactly the rules I go by however this Paladin considered HP aug was something only a tank would need. So according to him, since we all agreed on using NBG, he should get the HP aug.
According to me we should all /random 1k for it since we all need HP, NBG or not.
#10 Jul 11 2005 at 9:31 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Exactly the rules I go by however this Paladin considered HP aug was something only a tank would need. So according to him, since we all agreed on using NBG, he should get the HP aug.
According to me we should all /random 1k for it since we all need HP, NBG or not.


I would have to agree. If it is a class specific item, they should have first dibs (unless there are more than 1 of that class in the group). If its something that anyone can use (ie. a HP aug), anyone in the group should have equal rights to it.

Next time someone shouts out NBG in the group, get them to specify. NBG should only include class specific items. Anything that everyone can use should be rolled on.
#11 Jul 11 2005 at 9:31 AM Rating: Decent
My understanding of NBG was on a can and will use basis. So since your can and will use the item I would tell the Pally to **** off. I would have been different if you were looting it for an alt.

#12 Jul 11 2005 at 9:37 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
My wiz would have rolled on the aug. Hp is needed by all else you don't exist eh.

Too bad the tank had to make things so miserable for you. Smiley: frown
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#13 Jul 11 2005 at 9:43 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Looting rules always always should be established before your group takes the first swing. In your situation I would have rolled on the HP aug as well.

However, with an aug like STR it becomes a little more muddled. could you use an STR item? Absolutly, anyone can use to carry more stuff, but would you roll on it? or let the classes that use it as their primary stat have that roll? How about a CHA aug, everyone can use more CHA to sell to vendors, but would you roll on it as a tank, or let the ench, or bard have the first shot? What if your warrior is into tradeskilling? Do you roll on that INT aug or give it to the wizard?

This is why I'm for the most part against NBG. Anyone can argue a need for most anything. I would rather be in a FFA group and be remembered as the person that possibly could have used the drop but passed to the toons that needed/wanted it more.

To me it's worth more to be top on the clerics, "Invite that person to our group, I remember them as being allot of fun to play with!" list than to win some crappy ring I dumped off for 200pp in the bazaar. JM 2cp
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#14 Jul 11 2005 at 9:44 AM Rating: Decent
HP augs benefit everyone so everyone should roll on them.
#15 Jul 11 2005 at 9:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
sjames wrote:
I would have to agree. If it is a class specific item, they should have first dibs (unless there are more than 1 of that class in the group).
Even then what winds up happening is that you're happily playing your warrior, a group picks you up to go to Camp A, you spend most of the night at Camp A, named pops and dies and drops a robe. Wizard automatically gets new robe, you get nada despite the fact that without you tanking, no one would have gotten squat.

Don't get me wrong, I would pass on said robe nine times out of ten anyway. But, if it's a pick-up group, it should be my decision to pass on it and not required of me just because we went off to some camp that dropped no melee loot. It's unlikely that the newly dressed wizard will say "Hey, let's go find a camp for the warrior now!" so, in interest of fairness, everyone should just have the option of rolling if they wish.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#16 Jul 11 2005 at 9:49 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Even then what winds up happening is that you're happily playing your warrior, a group picks you up to go to Camp A, you spend most of the night at Camp A, named pops and dies and drops a robe. Wizard automatically gets new robe, you get nada despite the fact that without you tanking, no one would have gotten squat.

Don't get me wrong, I would pass on said robe nine times out of ten anyway. But, if it's a pick-up group, it should be my decision to pass on it and not required of me just because we went off to some camp that dropped no melee loot. It's unlikely that the newly dressed wizard will say "Hey, let's go find a camp for the warrior now!" so, in interest of fairness, everyone should just have the option of rolling if they wish.


I agree that everyone should have the option of rolling. But it really depends on the group's decision at the beginning. If they state, as soon as you join the group, that everything is NBG. You should make the decision right then and there if you want to stay in that group. You can try to convince them otherwise, but its usually in vain.
#17 Jul 11 2005 at 9:52 AM Rating: Decent
Lord xythex wrote:
Looting rules always always should be established before your group takes the first swing. In your situation I would have rolled on the HP aug as well.

However, with an aug like STR it becomes a little more muddled. could you use an STR item? Absolutly, anyone can use to carry more stuff, but would you roll on it? or let the classes that use it as their primary stat have that roll? How about a CHA aug, everyone can use more CHA to sell to vendors, but would you roll on it as a tank, or let the ench, or bard have the first shot? What if your warrior is into tradeskilling? Do you roll on that INT aug or give it to the wizard?


The rule I go with is that anyone who can use item and will use item should be able to roll without any hatetells or drama.
So if a wizard wants to roll on a STR aug he should be allowed, I would however consider him pretty stupid but thats a whole other issue.. :P

So in my group feel free to /random for any item you will use on the char your playing with in the group and I wont say anything.

#18 Jul 11 2005 at 9:58 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I would however consider him pretty stupid but thats a whole other issue.. :P


this is a joke I presume? Casters are the weakest classes and can probably benefit more from str augs than a tank like class who likely has str already maxed (with or without buffs).
#19 Jul 11 2005 at 10:07 AM Rating: Decent
Nah I don't think it's a joke. Casters don't need str at all. The only thing I ever really wished I had str for was in Uqua.
#20 Jul 11 2005 at 10:10 AM Rating: Decent
Sure a caster can use a str aug.. specially in Uqua but I still there are others who would benefit a whole lot more then a wizard from a STR aug. And why waste a aug slot with a STR aug when there are alot more meaningfull augs for a wizard out there?

Yeah I would consider a wizard rolling on a STR aug pretty stupid.. Sure if noone else wants it you can roll and use it until you get a better aug.. :)

Edited, Mon Jul 11 11:16:24 2005 by BumbiRagnar
#21 Jul 11 2005 at 10:14 AM Rating: Good
****
4,596 posts
Quote:
Even then what winds up happening is that you're happily playing your warrior, a group picks you up to go to Camp A, you spend most of the night at Camp A, named pops and dies and drops a robe. Wizard automatically gets new robe, you get nada despite the fact that without you tanking, no one would have gotten squat.

Don't get me wrong, I would pass on said robe nine times out of ten anyway. But, if it's a pick-up group, it should be my decision to pass on it and not required of me just because we went off to some camp that dropped no melee loot. It's unlikely that the newly dressed wizard will say "Hey, let's go find a camp for the warrior now!" so, in interest of fairness, everyone should just have the option of rolling if they wish.


The other issue you run into is you spend 4 hours at Camp A and your MT has to log. New warrior shows up and the next kill drops a war only tradeable item. Do you let him have it by default? Do you hold it against him when he has to log 15 minutes later?
____________________________
Nicroll 65 Assassin
Teltorid 52 Druid
Aude Sapere

Oh hell camp me all you want f**kers. I own this site and thus I own you. - Allakhazam
#22 Jul 11 2005 at 10:15 AM Rating: Decent
So true Aug slots are too valuable to waste on str(which is probably the least important stat for a wiz other than wis chr and agi) and even in Uqua it's only useful until you get an orb =p

back to the main topic you shouldn't feel bad about rolling AT ALL I got most of my anguish augs before most of the tanks HP is just as important for a caster as to a tank.........your mana means nothing when you are dead.
#23 Jul 11 2005 at 10:44 AM Rating: Good
***
1,087 posts
NBG in a random pick up group is silly . [period]
#24 Jul 11 2005 at 10:47 AM Rating: Decent
*
151 posts
I cringe everytime I'm in a group and someone plays the NBG card. What's worse, is when the other four players are cool with NBG, so arguing about it is pointless; the option becomes to accept it or leave the group (and lose rep).

NBG has NO place in pick-up groups.

Next time you're in the bazaar, drooling over that uber attuneable item from WoS or MPG... how exactly did that item end up for sale? Even more curiously, is the item being sold by a class that can use it? Disregard mules for the moment. If an item is usable by a class that is selling it, what is the probability that he or she claimed NBG and never intended to use it other than for selling?

But that's just one example. Another example mentioned earlier in the thread is, if I'm better equiped than someone else, then NBG suggests that dropped loots will go to the ill-equipped first. What is the motivation for the better equipped character?

Another example is, how is 'need' determined such that it qualifies for NBG? A good interpretation, already offered, is "the item can be used and will be used." But, what about the instances when two or more players can and will use the item, but the upgrade varies with each player. The item is worth +10hp to one player, +10 INT, +5 SV ALL, +50HP to another player. Clearly there is a case for "greater need", but then the argument falls back on to the ill-equipped player always getting first loots.

Also consider, an item's value is determined by its alternative uses. While it may be an immediate upgrade for someone, to me the item represents fast and phat cash with which I'd use to acquire an upgrade for myself.

Finally, the reality of EQ is that there are plat sellers. Any opportunity someone has to obtain a sellable item, they will take, even if it means citing NBG. Resist this behavior; don't let these people control the loots.

The circumstances where NBG can be tolerated is when the item is NO DROP (aka NO TRADE) and in guild situations; it goes without saying, groups with friends would generally apply NBG.
#25 Jul 11 2005 at 10:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
NBG is a sham. It's fine for friends and family, but never with strangers, for all the reasons Jophiel pointed out.

Of course I don't group with strangers in general any more anyway.

The other problem that you run into is that some players don't understand what other classes do, or what they need to do it. I'd default FT items to a bard over a cleric, for example, if they were both less than max, on the pricinple that bards are not helped in mana recovery by buffs and songs and have a dismally low med cap. I'd default STR to a rogue or monk, for the added attack. And so on.

And yes, everyone needs HP. I'd have been in there rolling right along with you, and grats to whoever wins it.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#26 Jul 11 2005 at 10:55 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
i generally play by my own CAWU (Can And Will Use) rules; I'm not going to roll on something unless one of my active characters can use it. If no one has an interest, then yeah I'll roll for it then donate it to the guild bank (or my trader).

I almost got greifed when I rolled for and won a STA aug in LDoN. I'm a necro...HP are very important, probably moreso than the other INT casters.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 159 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (159)