Dedaien wrote:
OK Tarv, maybe you're right as far as Rogues go, and maybe you're not. I was also speaking generally about PLing, which should be evident from the post.
No, Tarv wasn't maybe right as far as rogues go, he was completely right for ALL classes. A damage shield is not going to add up to the amount of damage a full group is going to do at 30+. This means two things, 1. You're going to have to swing that weapon MORE times to get the kill than you would in a group situation(thus more skill ups with your weapons). 2. It's going to take MORE time for the mob to die than it would in a regular group, and you're going to be taking all the hits from the mob(thus more defensive skill ups).
The key is the level of the person being powerleveled. If you're being powerleveled from 1-30 of course your weapon skills are going to be far behind as the damage shield is the vast majority of your damage output. At 30+ the damage shield is NOT your major source of damage output hence it doesn't outpace your skills. Try reading the OP and understanding the situation before you post your comments.
Dedaien wrote:
In typical fashion, your attitude is more harsh than required. Maybe that is the reason your Karma is under 3
I'm sorry if you assumed that putting an inane opening like "I respectfully disagree" at the opening to a rebuttal where you're completely wrong in your information should make you immune to criticism, but it doesn't.
People read these boards not only for opinions, but also for helpful information. If you post wrong information about something, that's someone who's playing the game based on a fallicy that YOU gave to them. If you're going to post incorrect information, then when someone corrects you on it(and he was perfectly civil in his correction of you I might add), you're wrong headed enough to think "Oh, someone wrote something contrary to what I did, I need to reply and argue against him" without thinking about the information(which you obviously did because after tarv responded with his second, less civil post you conceeded that MAYBE he was right after all) then you deserve to get told to press the reset button on your brain and think about things a bit more before posting again.
Let's look at the only two contrary comments Tarv put in his post shall we?
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
please engage brain before replying.
tarv of the Seven Seas wrote:
Thank you for your attention, please research you material before questioning the validity of my posts.
That's pretty much what you deserved to hear after he was quite civil in correcting you, and you
without considering it challenged his correct information.
And as far as his sub 3.00 rating, he has that because he upset a regular when he was new to the boards, who proceeded to rate him down. It has nothing to do with his attitude as he's usually a pretty friendly person.
As far as your crap about "only giving an opinion" care to explain what you meant when you said:
Dedaien wrote:
weapons skills will suffer - as a point of fact, not myth
Edited because I forgot my smiley
Edited, Wed May 5 00:05:08 2004 by danreynolds