Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Beastlord pet's nameFollow

#1 Apr 04 2004 at 11:21 AM Rating: Decent
All of the pet classes, except the beastlord, get a named pet. The beastlord's pet is named after its owner: Soandso's warder. I was wondering if one of the "old-timers" could explain why this is.
#2 Apr 04 2004 at 12:16 PM Rating: Good
****
5,135 posts
Because
#3 Apr 04 2004 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
**
710 posts
At one point I believe SOE had intended of having the warder actually travel with you from zone to zone, in doing that the only way to pretent pets with potentially the same name they had it called "soandso's warder". However, this is obviously not the case.

If you look at the Prima's Guide to SoL you can see they discuss this in the book.
#4 Apr 04 2004 at 12:39 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Because originally beastlord pets stayed with them even through zoning. You'd summon your pet via an ability, buff it up with the spells that now summon the pets and go to town. If they gave warders the same name as other pets, eventually two beastlords with pets named "Jobaner" would be in zone at the same time and I don't think two pets with the same name can exist at once within a zone. Using "Beastlord's Warder" solved this because since character names are unique per server, warder names would be as well.

Eventually they decided that "static" warders just weren't working out. They removed the Summon Warder ability and made each of the "pet buff" spells now actually summon a pre-buffed warder.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Apr 04 2004 at 3:48 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
If they gave warders the same name as other pets, eventually two beastlords with pets named "Jobaner" would be in zone at the same time and I don't think two pets with the same name can exist at once within a zone
Actually, they can. A baby magician in PoK had up a pet. He asked me if they ever get bigger, so I summoned one of the same type to show him the size difference. I actually have a screen shot of Lobantik and mini Lobantik standing shoulder to shoulder.

Hmmm, precognition of this thread?
#6 Apr 04 2004 at 7:09 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Color me wrong then Smiley: smile

Perhaps then the issue was that a persistant pet would try to rename itself from Jobaner to Lobantik (or whatever) upon zoning? Regardless, I'm pretty sure the whole persistant zoning pet thing was the basis of the X's Warder naming convention.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#7 Apr 05 2004 at 1:45 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Could be. Honestly, I never gave it a thought. All the pet names are a bit doofy anyway, so there's nothing to envy. Smiley: tongue
Wizard's familiars don't have names either, right?
#8 Apr 05 2004 at 3:30 AM Rating: Decent
I always thought it had to do with the roleplay aspect of beastlords. Their warders are supposed to be an animal that they have bonded with as opposed to a necro who animates a random skeleton or a mage who would summon the random elemental from another plane. /shrug
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 111 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (111)