Dread Lord rugbyprop wrote:
I am thinking of going wireless. I have a question about what speed is acceptable to play EQ. I would be within 15 feet of the router, so Super G would work, was wondering if it worth the additional cost.
Ok. Other then the cool "I'm using this nifty new technology" aspect, is there a real reason why you want/need to use a wireless connection? If you're within 15 feet of the router, why not just buy an ethernet cable and be done with it?
Assuming similar tech levels (ie: Not using land lines built in the 50s), you will always get a faster speed out of a cable then over the air. The connection on your side of your typical cable modem is a "slow" 10mbs. Most OTA connections are "fast" at 1.2mbs, with the "really fast" ones topping out just a bit under 10mbs.
There's always a possibility of interference when using an OTA solution. A land line has none (unless rats have chewed your cables or something). Everything else being equal, there is zero benefit to using a wireless connection in terms of performance. You sacrifice performance for flexibility. Being able to move your laptop around from room to room is convenient. However, if you're at home anyway (which you are), and presumably have a desktop for your computer anyway, why not just wire it up right there? I suppose if you only have a laptop, I could maybe see this, but unless you need to roam around the house while playing EQ, why not just plug that laptop into a network cable instead?
Dunno. That's just my humble opinion. It's just that I see a lot of people who'll do things in a less efficient manner simply becuase it's "new" and "cool". Honestly, I have never seen any need to play EQ down by the pool, or in any area other then at my computer desk. Using wireless for being able to do some network tasks without being tied to the desk is great. But if I'm playing EQ, I'm sitting in one spot for an extended period anyway. Why not use a land line?